Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 3.6 years newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 1 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 4 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 3,690,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution24.2 MP66.8 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight680 g713 g
Battery760 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 6mm wider, 2mm taller, and 6mm thicker than Alpha 7R VI.

EOS R6 Mark II is 33 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
24.2 MP
66.8 MP2.8× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames+20%
150 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
600 Mbps+76%
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
680 g−33 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for Alpha 7R VI — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 33 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.