Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 3 years newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

4categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

10 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories·EOS R6 Mark III wins 3 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 64,000)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 150 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Resolution24.2 MP32.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40064,000
Burst40 fps40 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8.5-stop
Weight680 g699 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS R6 Mark II is 19 g lighter than EOS R6 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 640 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    680 g vs 699 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    32.5 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 8 stops — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Resolution
24.2 MP
32.5 MP+34%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames+20%
150 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Max resolution
4K UHD
7K RAW
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
2600 Mbps7.6× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Weight
680 g−19 g less
699 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R6 Mark II or EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R6 Mark III — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 19 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS R6 Mark II is $300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.