Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Released Jul 2024

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.6 years newer.

Wins

6categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

4categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

8 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 3 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 180 frames)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 320 shots)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark II
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight746 g680 g
Battery320 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 3mm taller and 5mm thicker than EOS R6 Mark II.

EOS R5 Mark II is 66 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 94 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

The verdict

The $1800 price gap between these cameras centers on the jump from a 24.2MP sensor to a 45MP stacked BSI CMOS sensor capable of 8K DCI RAW video.

Choose Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require maximum detail for large-scale printing or professional cinema workflows, as it offers 8K recording at bitrates up to 2600 Mbps and a higher resolution 5.76 million-dot viewfinder.

Choose Canon EOS R6 Mark II if you prioritize endurance and value, as it delivers a significantly higher battery life of 760 CIPA-rated shots and a faster 40 fps electronic burst rate.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 101.2, 93.5

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 98.4, 88.4

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    680 g vs 746 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark II
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
600 frames3.3× more
180 frames
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark II
Max resolution
8K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps7.6× more
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark II
Weight
746 g
680 g−66 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 101.2 × 93.5 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R5 Mark II or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 66 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $1,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.