Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R3

Pro 24MP full-frame stacked-sensor body built for sports, news, wildlife, and high-speed hybrid capture.

$5,999

Released Sep 2021

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 1.2 years newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS R3

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

5categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

9 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R3 wins 3 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R3 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R3 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AEOS R3 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has lower Weight (680 g vs 1015 g)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R3EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution24.1 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,400102,400
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight1015 g680 g
Battery620 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R3

150 × 143 × 87 mm

1015 g (2.24 lb / 35.80 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

EOS R3 is 1mm thinner than EOS R6 Mark II but it is also 12mm wider and 44mm taller.

EOS R3 is 335 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R3 · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R3

150 × 143 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R3

150 × 87 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R3

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R3EOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R3

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 142.6, 87.2

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Motorsport vehicles

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Horses, Cars, Motorbikes…

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Weight

    680 g vs 1015 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 620 shots — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 24.1 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 102,400
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R3

Pros

  • 30fps electronic burst from a stacked full-frame sensor
  • Exceptional low-light AF down to -7.5 EV
  • Integrated pro body with large LP-E19 battery
  • 6K RAW video and 4K 120p
  • Rugged weather-sealed construction

Cons

  • 24MP resolution trails higher-detail rivals
  • Large integrated-grip body
  • Expensive compared with enthusiast full-frame bodies

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R3
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
24.1 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R3
EOS R6 Mark II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Motorsport vehicles
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R3
EOS R6 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
180 frames+20%
EOS R3
EOS R6 Mark II
Max resolution
6K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps7.6× more
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
RAW, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R3
EOS R6 Mark II
Weight
1015 g
680 g−335 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
150 × 142.6 × 87.2 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R3 or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R3 — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R3 is 24.1 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R3 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R3 or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R3 reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R3 weighs 1015 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 335 g lighter.

Do the EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R3: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R3 and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R3: Yes. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 620 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R3 and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R3 launched at $5,999 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $3,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.