Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R3

Pro 24MP full-frame stacked-sensor body built for sports, news, wildlife, and high-speed hybrid capture.

$5,999

Released Sep 2021

vs

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Released Jul 2020

EOS R3 is 1.2 years newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS R3

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

3categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

11 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R3 wins 3 categories·EOS R5 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R3 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BEOS R5 has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 24.1 MP)
  • AEOS R3 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 20 fps)
  • BEOS R5 has lower Weight (738 g vs 1015 g)
  • AEOS R3 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (620 shots vs 490 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R3EOS R5
Resolution24.1 MP45 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight1015 g738 g
Battery620 shots490 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R3

150 × 143 × 87 mm

1015 g (2.24 lb / 35.80 oz)

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS R3 is 1mm thinner than EOS R5 but it is also 12mm wider and 45mm taller.

EOS R3 is 277 g heavier than EOS R5.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R3 · 88mm EOS R5

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R3

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R3EOS R5
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R3

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 142.6, 87.2

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    620 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Motorsport vehicles

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 24.1 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    738 g vs 1015 g — lower is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R3

Pros

  • 30fps electronic burst from a stacked full-frame sensor
  • Exceptional low-light AF down to -7.5 EV
  • Integrated pro body with large LP-E19 battery
  • 6K RAW video and 4K 120p
  • Rugged weather-sealed construction

Cons

  • 24MP resolution trails higher-detail rivals
  • Large integrated-grip body
  • Expensive compared with enthusiast full-frame bodies

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R3
EOS R5
Resolution
24.1 MP
45 MP+87%
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R3
EOS R5
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Motorsport vehicles
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds
EOS R3
EOS R5
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps+50%
20 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
180 frames+20%
EOS R3
EOS R5
Max resolution
6K RAW
8K RAW
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps
2600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
RAW, H.265, H.264
RAW, H.265, H.264
EOS R3
EOS R5
Weight
1015 g
738 g−277 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
150 × 142.6 × 87.2 mm
138.5 × 97.5 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R3 or EOS R5?

EOS R5 scores 8.5/10 versus 7.0/10 for EOS R3 — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R3 and EOS R5?

EOS R3 is 24.1 MP and EOS R5 is 45 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R3 and EOS R5 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R3 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R3 or the EOS R5?

EOS R3 reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R3 and EOS R5?

EOS R3 weighs 1015 g and EOS R5 weighs 738 g, so the EOS R5 is 277 g lighter.

Do the EOS R3 and EOS R5 record 4K video?

EOS R3: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R3 and EOS R5 weather sealed?

EOS R3: Yes. EOS R5: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 620 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R3 and 490 shots for the EOS R5, giving the EOS R3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R3 launched at $5,999 and EOS R5 at $3,899. The EOS R5 is $2,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.