Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Released Jul 2020

vs
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

EOS R6 Mark II is 2.3 years newer.

Wins

4categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

5categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

9 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 wins 3 categories·EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R5 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AEOS R5 has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 24.2 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst20 fps40 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight738 g680 g
Battery490 shots760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

EOS R5 is 1mm shorter than EOS R6 Mark II.

EOS R5 is 58 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R5 · 88mm EOS R6 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5EOS R6 Mark II
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

The verdict

The $1,400 price gap between these cameras centers on the trade-off between the R5's 45-megapixel resolution and the R6 Mark II's faster electronic burst speed.

Choose Canon EOS R5 if your workflow demands maximum detail for large prints or high-end video, as it offers 8K RAW video and a 5.76-million dot EVF. The 45-megapixel sensor provides significant cropping flexibility that the 24.2-megapixel model lacks.

Choose Canon EOS R6 Mark II if you prioritize action photography and endurance, benefiting from its 40fps electronic shutter and 760-shot CIPA battery rating. This model also includes pre-capture capabilities and a native ISO reaching 102,400 for low-light environments.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Horses, Cars, Motorbikes…

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    680 g vs 738 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5
EOS R6 Mark II
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5
EOS R6 Mark II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R5
EOS R6 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
40 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
180 frames
EOS R5
EOS R6 Mark II
Max resolution
8K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps7.6× more
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
RAW, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R5
EOS R6 Mark II
Weight
738 g
680 g−58 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.5 × 97.5 × 88 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R5 or EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R5 — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 is 45 MP and EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 and EOS R6 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 or the EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 and EOS R6 Mark II?

EOS R5 weighs 738 g and EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 58 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 and EOS R6 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 and EOS R6 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R5: Yes. EOS R6 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 490 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 and 760 shots for the EOS R6 Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 launched at $3,899 and EOS R6 Mark II at $2,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $1,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.