Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

Alpha 1 II is 5 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

6categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 2 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 3 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 200 frames)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher EVF refresh rate (240 Hz vs 120 Hz)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 5,760,000)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (520 shots vs 320 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIAlpha 1 II
Resolution45 MP50.1 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8.5-stop
Weight746 g743 g
Battery320 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 2mm wider, 4mm taller, and 11mm thicker than Alpha 1 II.

EOS R5 Mark II is 3 g heavier than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIAlpha 1 II
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Landscape
8.5Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 200 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 32,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • EVF refresh rate

    240 Hz vs 120 Hz — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 5,760,000 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    520 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.9 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
45 MP
50.1 MP+11%
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+0.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R5 Mark II or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 1 II?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Alpha 1 II?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 1 II?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the Alpha 1 II is 3 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The EOS R5 Mark II is $2,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.