Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Released Jul 2024

vs
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Released May 2026

EOS R6 V is 1.8 years newer.

Wins

3categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

5categories

EOS R6 V

WildlifeSports & Action

7 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 2 categories·EOS R6 V wins 3 categories
  • BEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 1053)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 150 frames)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 320 shots)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 32.5 MP)
  • BEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIEOS R6 V
Resolution45 MP32.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20064,000
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop7.5-stop
Weight746 g688 g
Battery320 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 3mm narrower than EOS R6 V but it is also 18mm taller and 14mm thicker.

EOS R5 Mark II is 58 g heavier than EOS R6 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 80mm EOS R6 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 mm

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 94 mm

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIEOS R6 V
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Travel
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

The verdict

The $1800 price gap between these cameras centers on the Canon EOS R5 Mark II's 45-megapixel stacked sensor and integrated 5.76-million dot EVF versus the viewfinder-less Canon EOS R6 V.

Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require a high-resolution professional workflow demanding 8K DCI video and a 600-frame RAW burst buffer. Its stacked sensor and 1/32000 second electronic shutter speed provide a distinct advantage for high-speed action.

Choose the Canon EOS R6 V if you prioritize endurance and speed, as it offers 640 CIPA shots and a faster 40 fps electronic burst rate. This model suits users who prefer a lighter 688-gram body and can work without a built-in viewfinder.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 101.2, 93.5

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 7.5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Weight

    688 g vs 746 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Resolution
45 MP+38%
32.5 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 V
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
60975.8× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Horse, Vehicle, Airplane, Train
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
600 frames4× more
150 frames
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Max resolution
8K RAW
7K RAW / 7K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps
2600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R6 V
Weight
746 g
688 g−58 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 101.2 × 93.5 mm
141.8 × 83.3 × 79.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R5 Mark II or EOS R6 V?

EOS R6 V scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 V?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 V have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the EOS R6 V?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 V?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and EOS R6 V weighs 688 g, so the EOS R6 V is 58 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 V record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R6 V weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 V, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and EOS R6 V at $2,499. The EOS R6 V is $1,800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.