Canon
EOS R5 Mark II
45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.
$4,299
Launch priceReleased Jul 2024
Sony
Alpha 7 V
33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.
$2,899
Launch priceReleased Dec 2025
Alpha 7 V is 1.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R5 Mark II
Wins
Alpha 7 V
6 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 95 frames)
- AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
- BAlpha 7 V has higher Battery life (CIPA) (630 shots vs 320 shots)
- AEOS R5 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,686,400)
- AEOS R5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 759)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R5 Mark II
139 × 101 × 94 mm
746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Alpha 7 V
130 × 96 × 82 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
EOS R5 Mark II is 8mm wider, 5mm taller, and 11mm thicker than Alpha 7 V.
EOS R5 Mark II is 51 g heavier than Alpha 7 V.
Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7 V
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R5 Mark II
139 × 101 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 V
130 × 96 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R5 Mark II
139 × 94 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 V
130 × 82 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R5 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Alpha 7 V
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R5 Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
Alpha 7 V
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R5 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5
RAW buffer depth
600 frames vs 95 frames — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7 V
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II
Battery life (CIPA)
630 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better
Weight
695 g vs 746 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 51,200
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (electronic) — Both 30 fps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R5 Mark II
Pros
- ✓45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
- ✓8K 60p RAW internal recording
- ✓30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
- ✓5.76M dot EVF
Cons
- –Premium $4,299 price
- –Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
- –Body heat in extended 8K sessions
Alpha 7 V
Pros
- ✓33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
- ✓Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
- ✓7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
- ✓759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
- ✓7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
- ✓Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
- ✓Up to 16 stops dynamic range
Cons
- –Premium price vs α7 IV
- –4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
- –Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
- –Complex menu and feature set
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Sony Alpha 7 V
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, EOS R5 Mark II or Alpha 7 V?
Alpha 7 V scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?
EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Alpha 7 V?
EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?
EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the Alpha 7 V is 51 g lighter.
Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?
EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?
EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The Alpha 7 V is $1,400 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs Alpha 7 V vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.