Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 1.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

3categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

6 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 4 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 95 frames)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Battery life (CIPA) (630 shots vs 320 shots)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,686,400)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 759)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Resolution45 MP33 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop7.5-stop
Weight746 g695 g
Battery320 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 8mm wider, 5mm taller, and 11mm thicker than Alpha 7 V.

EOS R5 Mark II is 51 g heavier than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Travel
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 95 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    630 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    695 g vs 746 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
45 MP+36%
33 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7 V
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R5 Mark II or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Alpha 7 V?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the Alpha 7 V is 51 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The Alpha 7 V is $1,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.