Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Released Jul 2024

vs

Sony

Alpha 7R V

61MP resolution champion with AI-based AF and 8-stop IBIS for landscape and studio work.

$3,899

Released Oct 2022

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.7 years newer.

Wins

10categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7R V

Video & HybridLandscape

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 4 categories·Alpha 7R V wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 68 frames)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R V has higher Battery life (CIPA) (530 shots vs 320 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIAlpha 7R V
Resolution45 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst30 fps10 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight746 g723 g
Battery320 shots530 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Alpha 7R V

131 × 97 × 82 mm

723 g (1.59 lb / 25.50 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 7mm wider, 4mm taller, and 11mm thicker than Alpha 7R V.

EOS R5 Mark II is 23 g heavier than Alpha 7R V.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7R V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 101 mm

Alpha 7R V

131 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

138 × 94 mm

Alpha 7R V

131 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7R V

35.7 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

850 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIAlpha 7R V
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Landscape
8.5Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

The verdict

The $400 price gap separates the Canon EOS R5 Mark II's high-speed stacked sensor from the Sony Alpha 7R V's 61-megapixel resolution.

Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require high-speed performance for action or cinema, as it delivers 30fps electronic bursts and internal 8K DCI RAW recording. Its stacked sensor architecture and 600-frame RAW buffer are built for professional sports and wildlife workflows.

Choose the Sony Alpha 7R V if your priority is maximum image detail and power efficiency, featuring a 61-megapixel sensor and 530-shot battery life. The 9440000-dot EVF and lower price point make it the choice for landscape and studio photographers.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 101.2, 93.5

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 68 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R5 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.9, 82.4

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    530 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 5,760,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 45 MP — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.9 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

Alpha 7R V

Pros

  • 61MP — exceptional detail and crop flexibility
  • AI-based subject recognition (AI Processing Unit)
  • 8-stop IBIS compensation
  • 9.44M dot EVF — highest on market

Cons

  • 10fps burst limits sports/action use
  • Large RAW files (61MB+ each)
  • No internal RAW video

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7R V
Resolution
45 MP
61 MP+36%
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.7 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7R V
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+52%
693
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7R V
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps3× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
600 frames8.8× more
68 frames
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7R V
Max resolution
8K RAW
8K
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps4.3× more
600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R5 Mark II
Alpha 7R V
Weight
746 g
723 g−23 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 101.2 × 93.5 mm
131.3 × 96.9 × 82.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R5 Mark II or Alpha 7R V?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for Alpha 7R V — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7R V?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Alpha 7R V is 61 MP, so the Alpha 7R V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7R V have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R V has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Alpha 7R V?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7R V reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7R V?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Alpha 7R V weighs 723 g, so the Alpha 7R V is 23 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7R V record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7R V: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Alpha 7R V weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7R V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 530 shots for the Alpha 7R V, giving the Alpha 7R V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Alpha 7R V at $3,899. The Alpha 7R V is $400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.