Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Z8

Nikon

Z8

Z9 internals in a compact body — 45.7MP stacked sensor, 8K 60p, no blackout burst.

$3,999

Launch price

Released May 2023

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

7categories

Z8

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 3 categories·Z8 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BZ8 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 493)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BZ8 has higher RAW buffer depth (1000 frames vs 600 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIZ8
Resolution45 MP45.7 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst30 fps120 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight746 g820 g
Battery320 shots340 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Z8 front view

Z8

144 × 119 × 83 mm

820 g (1.81 lb / 28.92 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 6mm narrower and 17mm shorter than Z8 but it is also 11mm thicker.

EOS R5 Mark II is 74 g lighter than Z8.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 83mm Z8

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z8 back view

Z8

144 × 119 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z8 top view

Z8

144 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Z8

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Z8

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIZ8
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Landscape
8.5Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

The verdict

The primary trade-off is a $300 price difference favoring the Nikon Z8 against the Canon EOS R5 Mark II's significantly deeper 600-shot RAW buffer.

Choose the Canon EOS R5 Mark II if you require sustained high-speed shooting, as its 600-shot RAW buffer is much larger than the 124-shot capacity of its rival. The 30 fps electronic burst rate further cements its position as the superior choice for action photographers.

Choose the Nikon Z8 if you prioritize low-light performance, as its -10 EV autofocus sensitivity is significantly more capable than the -6.5 EV rating on the Canon. Its electronic-only shutter and $3999 price make it a more cost-effective choice for hybrid shooters using ProRes RAW.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 493 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R5 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Z8

  • AF low-light limit

    -9 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds N-RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, ProRes 422 HQ…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 144, 118.5, 83

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B / XQD

  • RAW buffer depth

    1000 frames vs 600 frames — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    64 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bicycles, Motorcycles, Airplanes

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

Z8

Pros

  • 45.7MP stacked CMOS from Z9 — class-leading
  • 8K 60p N-RAW internal
  • No mechanical shutter wear — fully electronic
  • 20fps at full 45.7MP resolution

Cons

  • EN-EL15c battery life only 340 CIPA shots
  • No built-in grip (unlike Z9)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and Z8 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
Z8
Resolution
45 MP
45.7 MP+2%
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R5 Mark II
Z8
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
EXPEED 7
EOS R5 Mark II
Z8
ISO min (native)
100
64−36 less
ISO max (native)
51,200+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5 Mark II
Z8
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic only
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
N/A
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R5 Mark II or Z8?

Z8 scores 9.5/10 versus 8.5/10 for EOS R5 Mark II — 45.7MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Z8?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and Z8 is 45.7 MP, so the Z8 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Z8 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Z8 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the Z8?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Z8 reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and Z8?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and Z8 weighs 820 g, so the EOS R5 Mark II is 74 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and Z8 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Z8: 8K UHD (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and Z8 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. Z8: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 340 shots for the Z8, giving the Z8 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and Z8 at $3,999. The Z8 is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 Mark II vs Z8 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.