Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 Mark II

Canon

EOS R5 Mark II

45MP stacked-sensor powerhouse with 8K 60p RAW internal and 30fps burst.

$4,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Canon

EOS R50

Tiny 24MP APS-C RF-mount camera for creators, travel, and beginners who want strong autofocus and easy 4K.

$679

Launch price

Released Feb 2023

EOS R5 Mark II is 1.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R5 Mark II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

3categories

EOS R50

Travel

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 Mark II wins 5 categories·EOS R50 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (600 frames vs 7 frames)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 120 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R5 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 Mark IIEOS R50
Resolution45 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull Frame22.3 × 14.9 mm
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight746 g375 g
Battery320 shots440 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II front view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 × 94 mm

746 g (1.64 lb / 26.31 oz)

EOS R50

116 × 86 × 69 mm

375 g (0.83 lb / 13.23 oz)

EOS R5 Mark II is 22mm wider, 16mm taller, and 25mm thicker than EOS R50.

EOS R5 Mark II is 371 g heavier than EOS R50.

Depth (front-to-back): 94mm EOS R5 Mark II · 69mm EOS R50

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 Mark II back view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 101 mm

EOS R50

116 × 86 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 Mark II top view

EOS R5 Mark II

139 × 94 mm

EOS R50

116 × 69 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R50

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R50

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 Mark IIEOS R50
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.2, 93.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    600 frames vs 7 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 120 Mbps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R50

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116.3, 85.5, 68.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    375 g vs 746 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    440 shots vs 320 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.95 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 Mark II

Pros

  • 45MP stacked CMOS — speed and resolution
  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • 30fps electronic burst at full 45MP
  • 5.76M dot EVF

Cons

  • Premium $4,299 price
  • Short battery life (320 CIPA shots)
  • Body heat in extended 8K sessions

EOS R50

Pros

  • Very compact and lightweight
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II subject tracking
  • Oversampled 4K 30p video
  • Fully articulating touchscreen
  • Accessible price

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Single SD card slot
  • Limited physical controls
  • No headphone jack

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R50 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R50
Resolution
45 MP+86%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
22.3 × 14.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R50
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R50
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+0.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R50
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/8000 sec
EOS R5 Mark II
EOS R50
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053+62%
651
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R5 Mark II or EOS R50?

EOS R5 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for EOS R50 — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R50?

EOS R5 Mark II is 45 MP and EOS R50 is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R50 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 Mark II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R50 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 Mark II or the EOS R50?

EOS R5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R50 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R50?

EOS R5 Mark II weighs 746 g and EOS R50 weighs 375 g, so the EOS R50 is 371 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R50 record 4K video?

EOS R5 Mark II: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. EOS R50: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R5 Mark II and EOS R50 weather sealed?

EOS R5 Mark II: Yes. EOS R50: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 Mark II and 440 shots for the EOS R50, giving the EOS R50 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 Mark II launched at $4,299 and EOS R50 at $679. The EOS R50 is $3,620 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.