Canon
EOS 7D Mark II
APS-C sports DSLR flagship with 20.2MP, 10fps burst, 65-point cross-type AF, Dual Pixel live-view AF, and pro magnesium build.
$1,799
Launch priceReleased Sep 2014
Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
EOS R6 Mark III is 11.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS 7D Mark II
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 0 fps)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 65)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 24 frames)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS 7D Mark II
149 × 112 × 78 mm
820 g (1.81 lb / 28.92 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
EOS 7D Mark II is 10mm thinner than EOS R6 Mark III but it is also 10mm wider and 14mm taller.
EOS 7D Mark II is 121 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark III.
Depth (front-to-back): 78mm EOS 7D Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS 7D Mark II
149 × 112 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS 7D Mark II
149 × 78 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS 7D Mark II
22.4 × 15 mm · APS-C
336 mm² area
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS 7D Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon EF
300+
native lenses available
EOS R6 Mark III
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS 7D Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds Human face (iTR AF)
Codecs
Adds H.264 (MOV / MP4)
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 148.6, 112.4, 78.2
Card types
Adds CF (UDMA 7), SD UHS-I
EVF magnification
1 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
670 shots vs 640 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
IBIS effectiveness
8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
- ✓Headphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support headphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS 7D Mark II
Pros
- ✓10fps with 65 cross-type AF points
- ✓Dual DIGIC 6 + Dual Pixel CMOS AF
- ✓CF + SD dual card slots
- ✓Weather-sealed magnesium body
- ✓Built-in GPS
Cons
- –20MP resolution behind newer bodies
- –No 4K video (1080p60 max)
- –No Wi-Fi built-in
- –DSLR platform aging
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS 7D Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS 7D Mark II or EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for EOS 7D Mark II — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS 7D Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS 7D Mark II is 20.2 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS 7D Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?
EOS 7D Mark II does not have IBIS, while EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS 7D Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS 7D Mark II reaches 10 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS 7D Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS 7D Mark II weighs 820 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 121 g lighter.
Do the EOS 7D Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?
EOS 7D Mark II: Full HD (1920 × 1080). EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS 7D Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?
EOS 7D Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 670 shots (CIPA) for the EOS 7D Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS 7D Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS 7D Mark II launched at $1,799 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS 7D Mark II is $1,000 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS 7D Mark II vs EOS R6 Mark III vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.