Canon
EOS M6 Mark II
Fast APS-C EF-M body with 32.5MP and 14fps — popular on the used market.
$849
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
Sony
Alpha 7 V
33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.
$2,899
Launch priceReleased Dec 2025
Alpha 7 V is 6.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS M6 Mark II
Wins
Alpha 7 V
5 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAlpha 7 V has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 143)
- BAlpha 7 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- BAlpha 7 V has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
- AEOS M6 Mark II has lower Weight (408 g vs 695 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS M6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
408 g (0.90 lb / 14.39 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Alpha 7 V
130 × 96 × 82 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
EOS M6 Mark II is 8mm wider, 2mm taller, and 6mm thicker than Alpha 7 V.
EOS M6 Mark II is 287 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS M6 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7 V
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS M6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 V
130 × 96 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS M6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 V
130 × 82 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS M6 Mark II
22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C
332 mm² area
Alpha 7 V
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS M6 Mark II: mount data unavailable
Alpha 7 V
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS M6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
Weight
408 g vs 695 g — lower is better
Burst (mechanical)
14 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Vehicle
AF frame coverage
100 % vs 94 % — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
640 shots vs 630 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7 V
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4
AF points / zones
759 vs 143 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Insect, Car, Train…
ISO max (native)
51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Animal / bird AF
Only Alpha 7 V supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Burst (electronic) — Both 30 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS M6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓32.5MP APS-C
- ✓14fps
- ✓Compact
Cons
- –EF-M mount dead-end
- –No IBIS
- –No EVF built-in
Alpha 7 V
Pros
- ✓33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
- ✓Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
- ✓7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
- ✓759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
- ✓7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
- ✓Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
- ✓Up to 16 stops dynamic range
Cons
- –Premium price vs α7 IV
- –4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
- –Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
- –Complex menu and feature set
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS M6 Mark II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
Sony Alpha 7 V
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, EOS M6 Mark II or Alpha 7 V?
Alpha 7 V scores 8.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for EOS M6 Mark II — 4K recording.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS M6 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?
EOS M6 Mark II is 32.5 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS M6 Mark II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?
EOS M6 Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS M6 Mark II or the Alpha 7 V?
EOS M6 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS M6 Mark II and Alpha 7 V?
EOS M6 Mark II weighs 408 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the EOS M6 Mark II is 287 g lighter.
Do the EOS M6 Mark II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?
EOS M6 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS M6 Mark II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?
EOS M6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS M6 Mark II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the EOS M6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS M6 Mark II launched at $849 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The EOS M6 Mark II is $2,050 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.