Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS M6 Mark II

Fast APS-C EF-M body with 32.5MP and 14fps — popular on the used market.

$849

Released Aug 2019

vs
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 6.2 years newer.

Wins

3categories

EOS M6 Mark II

TravelWildlife

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

7 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS M6 Mark II wins 0 categories·EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 143)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS M6 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Resolution32.5 MP32.5 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max25,60064,000
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBIS6-stop8.5-stop
Weight408 g699 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS M6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

408 g (0.90 lb / 14.39 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

EOS M6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS M6 Mark II is 291 g lighter than EOS R6 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS M6 Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS M6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS M6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS M6 Mark II

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS M6 Mark II: mount data unavailable

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS M6 Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Portrait
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS M6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Weight

    408 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    14 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 143 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 32.5 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS M6 Mark II

Pros

  • 32.5MP APS-C
  • 14fps
  • Compact

Cons

  • EF-M mount dead-end
  • No IBIS
  • No EVF built-in

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS M6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Resolution
32.5 MP
32.5 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.9 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS M6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
143
10537.4× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS M6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
14 fps+17%
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
150 frames2.5× more
EOS M6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Max resolution
4K UHD
7K RAW
4K max frame rate
30 fps
120 fps4× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
2600 Mbps17.3× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Codecs
H.264
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
EOS M6 Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Weight
408 g−291 g less
699 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS M6 Mark II or EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS M6 Mark II — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS M6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

Both cameras share the same 32.5 MP resolution.

Do the EOS M6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS M6 Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS M6 Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS M6 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS M6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS M6 Mark II weighs 408 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS M6 Mark II is 291 g lighter.

Do the EOS M6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS M6 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS M6 Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS M6 Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS M6 Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS M6 Mark II launched at $849 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS M6 Mark II is $1,950 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.