Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R10

Compact 24MP APS-C RF-mount camera with fast burst shooting, Dual Pixel AF II, and 4K 60p video.

$979

Released May 2022

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 4 years newer.

Wins

2categories

EOS R10

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

10categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R10 wins 0 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 29 frames)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 230 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R10Alpha 7R VI
Resolution24.2 MP66.8 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.9 mmFull Frame
ISO max32,00032,000
Burst23 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight429 g713 g
Battery450 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R10

123 × 88 × 83 mm

429 g (0.95 lb / 15.13 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

EOS R10 is 10mm narrower and 9mm shorter than Alpha 7R VI but it is also 1mm thicker.

EOS R10 is 284 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 83mm EOS R10 · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R10

123 × 88 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R10

123 × 83 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R10

22.3 × 14.9 mm · APS-C

332 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

2.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R10

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R10Alpha 7R VI
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R10

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122.5, 87.8, 83.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R10 supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R10 supports it

  • Weight

    429 g vs 713 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.95 × vs 0.9 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 29 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 230 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 32,000
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R10

Pros

  • Lightweight APS-C body
  • 15fps mechanical and 23fps electronic burst
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II subject tracking
  • Oversampled 4K 30p and 4K 60p option
  • Strong enthusiast value

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Single card slot
  • Smaller LP-E17 battery

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R10
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
24.2 MP
66.8 MP2.8× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.9 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R10
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
651
759+17%
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
EOS R10
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps
Burst (electronic)
23 fps
30 fps+30%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
RAW buffer depth
29 frames
150 frames5.2× more
EOS R10
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
230 Mbps
600 Mbps2.6× more
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
HDR PQ
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R10
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
429 g−284 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
122.5 × 87.8 × 83.4 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R10 or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for EOS R10 — 66.8MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R10 and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R10 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R10 and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R10 does not have IBIS, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R10 or the Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R10 reaches 23 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R10 and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R10 weighs 429 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the EOS R10 is 284 g lighter.

Do the EOS R10 and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

EOS R10: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R10 and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

EOS R10: No. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 450 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R10 and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R10 launched at $979 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The EOS R10 is $3,520 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.