Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Pentax

K-1 Mark II

36MP full-frame DSLR with IBIS and rugged build.

$1,999

Released Feb 2018

EOS R6 Mark III is 7.7 years newer.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

K-1 Mark II

WildlifePortrait

6 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·K-1 Mark II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 101)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIK-1 Mark II
Resolution32.5 MP36 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop7-stop
Weight699 g720 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

K-1 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS R6 Mark III is 21 g lighter than K-1 Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 88mm K-1 Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

K-1 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

K-1 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

K-1 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

K-1 Mark II

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIK-1 Mark II
Portrait
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good
7.5Good
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 101 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-1 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Resolution

    36 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

K-1 Mark II

Pros

  • 36MP FF DSLR
  • IBIS
  • Rugged
  • Affordable used

Cons

  • DSLR
  • Slow AF
  • Heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
K-1 Mark II
Resolution
32.5 MP
36 MP+11%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
K-1 Mark II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
SAFOX 12
AF points / zones
105310.4× more
101
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R6 Mark III
K-1 Mark II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2× more
20 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames+25%
120 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
K-1 Mark II
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
K-1 Mark II
Weight
699 g−21 g less
720 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
138 × 98 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or K-1 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for K-1 Mark II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and K-1 Mark II is 36 MP, so the K-1 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while k-1 Mark II has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the K-1 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. K-1 Mark II reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and K-1 Mark II weighs 720 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 21 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. K-1 Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and K-1 Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. K-1 Mark II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the K-1 Mark II, giving the K-1 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and K-1 Mark II at $1,999. The K-1 Mark II is $800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Pentax press materials.