Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
RED
KOMODO 6K
Compact Super 35 global-shutter cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, Canon RF mount, 16+ stops DR, and a built-in 2.9-inch touchscreen.
$5,995
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
EOS R6 Mark III is 5.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
KOMODO 6K
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 3,200)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 800)
- BKOMODO 6K has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 40 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
KOMODO 6K
102 × 102 × 102 mm
1000 g (2.20 lb / 35.27 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 4mm shorter and 14mm thinner than KOMODO 6K but it is also 36mm wider.
EOS R6 Mark III is 301 g lighter than KOMODO 6K.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 102mm KOMODO 6K
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
KOMODO 6K
102 × 102 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
KOMODO 6K
102 × 102 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
KOMODO 6K
27.03 × 14.26 mm · APS-C
385 mm² area
2.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
KOMODO 6K: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 800 — lower is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Eye AF
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Reasons to choose
KOMODO 6K
Codecs
Adds REDCODE RAW HQ/MQ/LQ, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 102, 102, 102
Card types
Adds CFast 2.0
Burst (electronic)
120 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
KOMODO 6K
Pros
- ✓Global shutter Super 35 6K sensor
- ✓16+ stops dynamic range
- ✓REDCODE RAW up to 120fps in 2K
- ✓Compact 952g aluminum body
- ✓12G-SDI + integrated touchscreen
Cons
- –Single CFast 2.0 slot
- –RF mount needs adapters for PL/EF
- –Small integrated monitor
- –No in-body ND filters
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO 6K at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
RED KOMODO 6K
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or KOMODO 6K?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 0.0/10 for KOMODO 6K — 32.5MP — ample resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO 6K?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and KOMODO 6K is 19.9 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO 6K have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while KOMODO 6K does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the KOMODO 6K?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. KOMODO 6K reaches 120 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO 6K?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and KOMODO 6K weighs 1000 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 301 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO 6K record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. KOMODO 6K: 6K 17:9 (6144 × 3240) (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO 6K weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. KOMODO 6K: No.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and KOMODO 6K at $5,995. The EOS R6 Mark III is $3,196 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs KOMODO 6K vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and RED press materials.