Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
RED
KOMODO-X
Global-shutter Super 35 cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, RF mount, and a larger body than KOMODO 6K.
$9,995
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
EOS R6 Mark III is 2.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
KOMODO-X
8 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 560 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has lower Weight (699 g vs 1190 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
KOMODO-X
129 × 101 × 95 mm
1190 g (2.62 lb / 41.98 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 3mm shorter and 7mm thinner than KOMODO-X but it is also 9mm wider.
EOS R6 Mark III is 491 g lighter than KOMODO-X.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 95mm KOMODO-X
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
KOMODO-X
129 × 101 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
KOMODO-X
129 × 95 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
KOMODO-X
27.03 × 14.26 mm · APS-C
385 mm² area
2.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
KOMODO-X
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 560 Mbps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
In-body stabilization (IBIS)
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Reasons to choose
KOMODO-X
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds REDCODE RAW, ProRes 422, ProRes 422 HQ…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 129.37, 101.26, 95.26
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 180 fps — higher is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 1053
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
KOMODO-X
Pros
- ✓Global shutter 6K
- ✓REDCODE RAW
- ✓Canon RF mount
- ✓Compact cinema form
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Cinema-first ergonomics
- –Premium media costs
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO-X at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
RED KOMODO-X
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or KOMODO-X?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for KOMODO-X — 32.5MP — ample resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO-X?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and KOMODO-X is 19.9 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO-X have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while KOMODO-X does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the KOMODO-X?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. KOMODO-X reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO-X?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and KOMODO-X weighs 1190 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 491 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO-X record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. KOMODO-X: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and KOMODO-X weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. KOMODO-X: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the KOMODO-X, giving the KOMODO-X the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and KOMODO-X at $9,995. The EOS R6 Mark III is $7,196 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs KOMODO-X vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and RED press materials.