Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Sigma

fp

Minimalist full-frame box camera for creative stills and video.

$1,899

Released Jul 2019

EOS R6 Mark III is 6.3 years newer.

Wins

14categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

fp

Portrait

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·fp wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIfp
Resolution32.5 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight699 g720 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

fp

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III and fp share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS R6 Mark III is 21 g lighter than fp.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 88mm fp

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

fp

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

fp

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

fp

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

fp: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIfp
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

fp

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

fp

Pros

  • Ultra compact
  • L-mount
  • Unique concept

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • 24MP
  • Poor ergonomics for long shoots

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
fp
Resolution
32.5 MP+34%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
fp
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase-detect AF
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %+11%
90 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R6 Mark III
fp
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps3.6× more
11 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames2.5× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
fp
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
fp
Weight
699 g−21 g less
720 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
138 × 98 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or fp?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for fp — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and fp?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and fp is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and fp have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while fp does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the fp?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. fp reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and fp?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and fp weighs 720 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 21 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and fp record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. fp: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and fp weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. fp: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the fp, giving the fp the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and fp at $1,899. The fp is $900 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sigma press materials.