Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Released Nov 2025
Sigma
sd Quattro H
Foveon sensor APS-H body with unique color rendering for stills purists.
$1,299
Released Mar 2016
EOS R6 Mark III is 9.7 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
sd Quattro H
4 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
sd Quattro H
138 × 98 × 88 mm
520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III and sd Quattro H share virtually identical body dimensions.
EOS R6 Mark III is 179 g heavier than sd Quattro H.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 88mm sd Quattro H
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
sd Quattro H
138 × 98 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
sd Quattro H
138 × 88 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
sd Quattro H
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
sd Quattro H: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
AF points / zones
1053 vs 49 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Reasons to choose
sd Quattro H
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
Resolution
44.8 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better
Weight
520 g vs 699 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
sd Quattro H
Pros
- ✓Unique Foveon color
- ✓High detail per pixel
- ✓Distinct look
Cons
- –Slow operation
- –Poor low light
- –Limited lens range
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or sd Quattro H?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for sd Quattro H — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and sd Quattro H?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and sd Quattro H is 44.8 MP, so the sd Quattro H captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and sd Quattro H have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while sd Quattro H has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the sd Quattro H?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. sd Quattro H reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and sd Quattro H?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and sd Quattro H weighs 520 g, so the sd Quattro H is 179 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and sd Quattro H record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. sd Quattro H: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and sd Quattro H weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. sd Quattro H: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the sd Quattro H, giving the sd Quattro H the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and sd Quattro H at $1,299. The sd Quattro H is $1,500 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sigma press materials.