Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Sony

Alpha 7R IV

61MP resolution king before the A7R V era.

$3,499

Released Sep 2019

EOS R6 Mark III is 6.2 years newer.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7R IV

LandscapePortrait

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·Alpha 7R IV wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 32,000)
  • BAlpha 7R IV has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 32.5 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIAlpha 7R IV
Resolution32.5 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max64,00032,000
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight699 g665 g
Battery640 shots670 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Alpha 7R IV

129 × 96 × 78 mm

665 g (1.47 lb / 23.46 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 10mm wider, 2mm taller, and 11mm thicker than Alpha 7R IV.

EOS R6 Mark III is 34 g heavier than Alpha 7R IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 78mm Alpha 7R IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 7R IV

129 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 7R IV

129 × 78 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 7R IV

35.7 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

850 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIAlpha 7R IV
Portrait
8.0Excellent
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 32,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128.9, 96.4, 77.5

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    665 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    670 shots vs 640 shots — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Alpha 7R IV

Pros

  • 61MP detail
  • Great for studio
  • Pixel shift mode

Cons

  • Slower AF than A7R V
  • Large files
  • Rolling shutter in video

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 7R IV
Resolution
32.5 MP
61 MP+88%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.7 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 7R IV
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+86%
567
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 7R IV
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames+25%
120 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 7R IV
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
S-Log2 / S-Log3 / HLG
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
XAVC S, AVCHD, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
Alpha 7R IV
Weight
699 g
665 g−34 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
128.9 × 96.4 × 77.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or Alpha 7R IV?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 7R IV — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R IV?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and Alpha 7R IV is 61 MP, so the Alpha 7R IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the Alpha 7R IV?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7R IV reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R IV?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and Alpha 7R IV weighs 665 g, so the Alpha 7R IV is 34 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R IV record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7R IV: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and Alpha 7R IV weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. Alpha 7R IV: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 670 shots for the Alpha 7R IV, giving the Alpha 7R IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and Alpha 7R IV at $3,499. The EOS R6 Mark III is $700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.