Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Sony

FX3

Compact full-frame cinema line camera with S-Cinetone and pro video ergonomics.

$3,899

Released Feb 2021

EOS R6 Mark III is 4.7 years newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

FX3

Video & HybridPortrait

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·FX3 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 12.1 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 627)
  • BFX3 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 64,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIFX3
Resolution32.5 MP12.1 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max64,000102,400
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight699 g715 g
Battery640 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

FX3

130 × 78 × 85 mm

715 g (1.58 lb / 25.22 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 9mm wider, 21mm taller, and 4mm thicker than FX3.

EOS R6 Mark III is 16 g lighter than FX3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 85mm FX3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

FX3

130 × 78 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

FX3

130 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

FX3

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

FX3

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIFX3
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    32.5 MP vs 12.1 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it

Reasons to choose

FX3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.7, 77.8, 84.5

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

FX3

Pros

  • Cinema form factor
  • S-Log3 / S-Cinetone
  • Compact for gimbals
  • Full-frame sensor

Cons

  • No EVF
  • Still photo ergonomics limited
  • Single card slot

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
FX3
Resolution
32.5 MP2.7× more
12.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
FX3
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+68%
627
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark III
FX3
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames+25%
120 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
FX3
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD / DCI 4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps4.3× more
600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
FX3
Weight
699 g−16 g less
715 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
129.7 × 77.8 × 84.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark III or FX3?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for FX3 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and FX3?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and FX3 is 12.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and FX3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while fX3 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the FX3?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. FX3 reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and FX3?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and FX3 weighs 715 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 16 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and FX3 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. FX3: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and FX3 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. FX3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 580 shots for the FX3, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and FX3 at $3,899. The EOS R6 Mark III is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.