Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
Sony
RX10 V
Fifth-gen 1-inch bridge with ZEISS 24–600mm f/2.4–4 zoom, BIONZ XR + AI AF, 30fps blackout-free bursts, 4K 120p video, and NP-FZ100 battery — successor to RX10 IV.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Aug 2026
RX10 V is 9 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
RX10 V
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 575)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
RX10 V
136 × 95 × 151 mm
1111 g (2.45 lb / 39.19 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 63mm thinner than RX10 V but it is also 2mm wider and 4mm taller.
EOS R6 Mark III is 412 g lighter than RX10 V.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 151mm RX10 V
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
RX10 V
136 × 95 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
RX10 V
136 × 151 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
RX10 V
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″
116 mm² area
7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
RX10 V: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Reasons to choose
RX10 V
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.4, 94.5, 151.3
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 180 fps — higher is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 120 fps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
RX10 V
Pros
- ✓24–600mm f/2.4–4 ZEISS 25x zoom
- ✓20.1MP stacked Exmor RS + BIONZ XR / AI AF
- ✓30fps blackout-free with AF/AE tracking
- ✓4K 60p / 4K 120p + S-Cinetone / S-Log3
- ✓NP-FZ100 (~630 shots) + USB-C PD
Cons
- –1-inch sensor vs interchangeable systems
- –Large bridge body (~1111 g)
- –Single SD UHS-II slot
- –Premium $2,299 MSRP
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and RX10 V at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Sony RX10 V
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or RX10 V?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for RX10 V — 32.5MP — ample resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and RX10 V?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and RX10 V is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and RX10 V have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while RX10 V uses Optical SteadyShot + Active Mode (electronic + optical for video) (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the RX10 V?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. RX10 V reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and RX10 V?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and RX10 V weighs 1111 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 412 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and RX10 V record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. RX10 V: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and RX10 V weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. RX10 V: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 630 shots for the RX10 V, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and RX10 V at $2,299. The RX10 V is $500 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs RX10 V vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.