Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
Z CAM
E2-S6
Super 35 6K cinema box camera with 14 stops DR, EF mount, ProRes/ZRAW internal recording, and 1Gb Ethernet.
$1,995
Launch priceReleased Jun 2020
EOS R6 Mark III is 5.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
E2-S6
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 6,400)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 300 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 500)
- BE2-S6 has higher Burst (electronic) (100 fps vs 40 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
E2-S6
91 × 99 × 122 mm
1090 g (2.40 lb / 38.45 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 1mm shorter and 34mm thinner than E2-S6 but it is also 47mm wider.
EOS R6 Mark III is 391 g lighter than E2-S6.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 122mm E2-S6
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
E2-S6
91 × 99 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
E2-S6
91 × 122 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
E2-S6
23.4 × 15.67 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
E2-S6
✓ more lensesCanon EF
300+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 300 Mbps — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 500 — lower is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Reasons to choose
E2-S6
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 91.2, 99.25, 122.25
Card types
Adds CFast 2.0
Burst (electronic)
100 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds ProRes, ZRAW
Both cameras share
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
- ✓Headphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support headphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
E2-S6
Pros
- ✓Super 35 26MP 6K sensor
- ✓6K up to 60fps / 4K up to 100fps
- ✓ProRes + ZRAW internal
- ✓14 stops dynamic range
- ✓1Gb Ethernet + HDMI
Cons
- –Rolling shutter (not global)
- –No built-in ND
- –Requires external monitor for framing
- –EF mount only (adapters for PL/MFT)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and E2-S6 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Z CAM E2-S6
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark III or E2-S6?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for E2-S6 — 32.5MP — ample resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and E2-S6?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and E2-S6 is 26 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and E2-S6 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while E2-S6 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the E2-S6?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. E2-S6 reaches 100 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and E2-S6?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and E2-S6 weighs 1090 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 391 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and E2-S6 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. E2-S6: 6K Open Gate (6244 × 4168) (max), 4K up to 100p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and E2-S6 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. E2-S6: No.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and E2-S6 at $1,995. The E2-S6 is $804 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs E2-S6 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Z CAM press materials.