Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released May 2026

vs
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

Osmo 360 II is 3 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 V

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

4categories

Osmo 360 II

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 V wins 3 categories·Osmo 360 II wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 0)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 220 Mbps)
  • BOsmo 360 II has lower Weight (183 g vs 688 g)
  • BOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 32.5 MP)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 VOsmo 360 II
Resolution32.5 MP120 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.1 inch
ISO max64,00051,200
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight688 g183 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

EOS R6 V is 106mm wider, 2mm taller, and 19mm thicker than Osmo 360 II.

EOS R6 V is 505 g heavier than Osmo 360 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 61mm Osmo 360 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 II

36 × 61 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo 360 II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 VOsmo 360 II
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 220 Mbps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Horse…

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 V supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only EOS R6 V supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Codecs

    Adds OSV, HEVC

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    183 g vs 688 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 7.5 stops — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • 14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • 120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • 105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • 100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • 10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 V and Osmo 360 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 V
Osmo 360 II
Resolution
32.5 MP
120 MP3.7× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/1.1 inch
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 V
Osmo 360 II
Aperture
f/1.9
EOS R6 V
Osmo 360 II
Processor
DIGIC X
High-performance ISP
EOS R6 V
Osmo 360 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
64,000+0.3 stops
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
EOS R6 V
Osmo 360 II
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 V or Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 V scores 8.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for Osmo 360 II — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and Osmo 360 II is 120 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 V and Osmo 360 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 505 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 V and Osmo 360 II record 4K video?

EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 V and Osmo 360 II weather sealed?

EOS R6 V: Yes. Osmo 360 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 520 shots for the Osmo 360 II, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and Osmo 360 II at $599. The Osmo 360 II is $1,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 V vs Osmo 360 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.