Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs
Z6 III

Nikon

Z6 III

First partially stacked full-frame sensor with 6K N-RAW internal video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

EOS R8 Mark II is 2.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

13categories

Z6 III

Sports & ActionPortrait

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 1 categories·Z6 III wins 4 categories
  • BZ6 III has higher RAW buffer depth (1000 frames vs 73 frames)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 299)
  • BZ6 III has higher Burst (mechanical) (20 fps vs 6 fps)
  • BZ6 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 40 fps)
  • BZ6 III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IIZ6 III
Resolution24.2 MP24.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,60064,000
Burst40 fps120 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBIS7.5-stop8-stop
Weight499 g760 g
Battery340 shots360 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Z6 III front view

Z6 III

139 × 102 × 74 mm

760 g (1.68 lb / 26.81 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 7mm narrower and 12mm shorter than Z6 III but it is also 6mm thicker.

EOS R8 Mark II is 261 g lighter than Z6 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 74mm Z6 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z6 III back view

Z6 III

139 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z6 III top view

Z6 III

139 × 74 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Z6 III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Z6 III

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IIZ6 III
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 299 — higher is better

  • Weight

    499 g vs 760 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Z6 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -10 EV vs -7.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Dogs…

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, Raw…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 101.5, 74

  • RAW buffer depth

    1000 frames vs 73 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    20 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Max video bit rateBoth 250 Mbps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

Z6 III

Pros

  • Partially stacked CMOS reduces rolling shutter
  • 6K N-RAW 60p internal — true filmmaking capability
  • 5.76M dot EVF — best-in-class resolution
  • 14fps mechanical burst

Cons

  • EN-EL15c battery life only 380 CIPA shots
  • Smaller lens ecosystem vs. Canon RF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Z6 III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
Z6 III
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.5 MP+1%
Sensor type
CMOS
Partially Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
35.9 x 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R8 Mark II
Z6 III
Processor
DIGIC X
EXPEED 7
EOS R8 Mark II
Z6 III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
64,000+1.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS R8 Mark II
Z6 III
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R8 Mark II or Z6 III?

Z6 III scores 6.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R8 Mark II — 4K 120p slow-motion.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Z6 III?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Z6 III is 24.5 MP, so the Z6 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Z6 III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Z6 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Z6 III?

EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Z6 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Z6 III?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Z6 III weighs 760 g, so the EOS R8 Mark II is 261 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Z6 III record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Z6 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Z6 III weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Z6 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 360 shots for the Z6 III, giving the Z6 III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Z6 III at $2,499. The EOS R8 Mark II is $600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Z6 III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.