Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

EOS R8 Mark II is 1.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

11categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 0 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 73 frames)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Resolution (50.1 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IIAlpha 1 II
Resolution24.2 MP50.1 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBIS7.5-stop8.5-stop
Weight499 g743 g
Battery340 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 5mm narrower, 7mm shorter, and 3mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

EOS R8 Mark II is 244 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IIAlpha 1 II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Max video bit rate

    250 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Weight

    499 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 73 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    50.1 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
50.1 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R8 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
EOS R8 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
32,000+0.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R8 Mark II
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R8 Mark II or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R8 Mark II — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Alpha 1 II?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Alpha 1 II?

EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Alpha 1 II?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the EOS R8 Mark II is 244 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The EOS R8 Mark II is $4,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.