Canon
EOS R8 Mark II
Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2026
RED
KOMODO 6K
Compact Super 35 global-shutter cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, Canon RF mount, 16+ stops DR, and a built-in 2.9-inch touchscreen.
$5,995
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
EOS R8 Mark II is 5.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R8 Mark II
Wins
KOMODO 6K
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R8 Mark II has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 800)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 3,200)
- BKOMODO 6K has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 40 fps)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has lower Weight (499 g vs 1000 g)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 19.9 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 × 80 mm
499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
KOMODO 6K
102 × 102 × 102 mm
1000 g (2.20 lb / 35.27 oz)
EOS R8 Mark II is 12mm shorter and 22mm thinner than KOMODO 6K but it is also 29mm wider.
EOS R8 Mark II is 501 g lighter than KOMODO 6K.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 102mm KOMODO 6K
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
KOMODO 6K
102 × 102 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
KOMODO 6K
102 × 102 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R8 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
KOMODO 6K
27.03 × 14.26 mm · APS-C
385 mm² area
2.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R8 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
KOMODO 6K: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R8 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds XF-HEVC S
Stabilization modes
Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO min (native)
100 vs 800 — lower is better
ISO max (native)
25,600 vs 3,200 — higher is better
Weight
499 g vs 1000 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
KOMODO 6K
Codecs
Adds REDCODE RAW HQ/MQ/LQ, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 102, 102, 102
Card types
Adds CFast 2.0
Burst (electronic)
120 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only KOMODO 6K supports it
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R8 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
- ✓Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
- ✓40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
- ✓Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
- ✓Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack
Cons
- –Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
- –Single SD UHS-II slot
- –LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
- –No mechanical shutter
KOMODO 6K
Pros
- ✓Global shutter Super 35 6K sensor
- ✓16+ stops dynamic range
- ✓REDCODE RAW up to 120fps in 2K
- ✓Compact 952g aluminum body
- ✓12G-SDI + integrated touchscreen
Cons
- –Single CFast 2.0 slot
- –RF mount needs adapters for PL/EF
- –Small integrated monitor
- –No in-body ND filters
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and KOMODO 6K at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
RED KOMODO 6K
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for travel, EOS R8 Mark II or KOMODO 6K?
EOS R8 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for KOMODO 6K — 499g — ultralight for all-day carry.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and KOMODO 6K?
EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and KOMODO 6K is 19.9 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and KOMODO 6K have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while KOMODO 6K does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the KOMODO 6K?
EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. KOMODO 6K reaches 120 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and KOMODO 6K?
EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and KOMODO 6K weighs 1000 g, so the EOS R8 Mark II is 501 g lighter.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and KOMODO 6K record 4K video?
EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. KOMODO 6K: 6K 17:9 (6144 × 3240) (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R8 Mark II and KOMODO 6K weather sealed?
EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. KOMODO 6K: No.
How much does each cost?
EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and KOMODO 6K at $5,995. The EOS R8 Mark II is $4,096 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs KOMODO 6K vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and RED press materials.