Canon
XA65
Professional 4K camcorder with 1/2.3-inch sensor, 20x zoom, XF-AVC/MP4, 3G-SDI, dual XLR, IR shooting, and detachable handle.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Oct 2022
Panasonic
AG-CX370
CX-series flagship with 1-inch 15MP MOS, 20x zoom, 10-bit 4K, 12G-SDI, genlock in, 4ch audio, NDI|HX2, and V-Log/HLG.
$6,995
Launch priceReleased Jul 2025
AG-CX370 is 2.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XA65
Wins
AG-CX370
5 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXA65 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 225)
- BAG-CX370 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- BAG-CX370 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
- BAG-CX370 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- BAG-CX370 has higher Resolution (15 MP vs 8.29 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareXA65
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AG-CX370
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
XA65 and AG-CX370 share virtually identical body dimensions.
XA65 and AG-CX370 weigh the same.
Depth (front-to-back): 72mm XA65 · 72mm AG-CX370
Sensor size, to scale
XA65
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
AG-CX370
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
XA65
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 225 — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better
AF frame coverage
100 % vs 90 % — higher is better
Reasons to choose
AG-CX370
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
Resolution
15 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
200 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XA65
Pros
- ✓XF-AVC + MP4 recording
- ✓3G-SDI + dual XLR (4ch LPCM)
- ✓20x optical zoom with ND-ready workflow
- ✓Infrared shooting support
- ✓Dual SD slots with relay recording
Cons
- –1/2.3-inch sensor limits low light
- –No Dual Pixel AF (contrast/hybrid only)
- –No built-in Wi-Fi
- –Smaller sensor than XA70
AG-CX370
Pros
- ✓12G-SDI + genlock/timecode
- ✓4-channel independent audio inputs
- ✓NDI|HX2 IP streaming
- ✓V-Log / HLG HDR workflow
- ✓Three-ring manual lens control
Cons
- –Premium broadcast pricing
- –Large body vs HC-X2
- –NDI requires network setup
- –Successor premium over CX350
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XA65 and AG-CX370 at major authorized retailers.
Canon XA65
Panasonic AG-CX370
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, XA65 or AG-CX370?
AG-CX370 scores 9.5/10 versus 7.5/10 for XA65 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.
What's the resolution difference between the XA65 and AG-CX370?
XA65 is 8.29 MP and AG-CX370 is 15 MP, so the AG-CX370 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the XA65 and AG-CX370 have in-body image stabilization?
XA65 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while AG-CX370 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the XA65 or the AG-CX370?
XA65 reaches 20 fps electronic. AG-CX370 reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the XA65 and AG-CX370?
Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.
Do the XA65 and AG-CX370 record 4K video?
XA65: 4K up to 60p. AG-CX370: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the XA65 and AG-CX370 weather sealed?
XA65: Yes. AG-CX370: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the XA65 and 520 shots for the AG-CX370, giving the XA65 the edge.
How much does each cost?
XA65 launched at $2,299 and AG-CX370 at $6,995. The XA65 is $4,696 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way XA65 vs AG-CX370 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.