Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Panasonic
AG-CX370
CX-series flagship with 1-inch 15MP MOS, 20x zoom, 10-bit 4K, 12G-SDI, genlock in, 4ch audio, NDI|HX2, and V-Log/HLG.
$6,995
Launch priceReleased Jul 2025
AG-CX370 is 2.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
AG-CX370
5 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 225)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
- BAG-CX370 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- BAG-CX370 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 15 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AG-CX370
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm wider, 7mm taller, and 16mm thicker than AG-CX370.
EOS R6 Mark II is 90 g heavier than AG-CX370.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 72mm AG-CX370
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
AG-CX370
134 × 91 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
AG-CX370
134 × 72 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
AG-CX370
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
AG-CX370: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
AF points / zones
1053 vs 225 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better
Resolution
24.2 MP vs 15 MP — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
AG-CX370
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds ProRes
Weight
580 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 12 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
AG-CX370
Pros
- ✓12G-SDI + genlock/timecode
- ✓4-channel independent audio inputs
- ✓NDI|HX2 IP streaming
- ✓V-Log / HLG HDR workflow
- ✓Three-ring manual lens control
Cons
- –Premium broadcast pricing
- –Large body vs HC-X2
- –NDI requires network setup
- –Successor premium over CX350
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and AG-CX370 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Panasonic AG-CX370
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or AG-CX370?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for AG-CX370 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and AG-CX370?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and AG-CX370 is 15 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and AG-CX370 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while AG-CX370 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the AG-CX370?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. AG-CX370 reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and AG-CX370?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and AG-CX370 weighs 580 g, so the AG-CX370 is 90 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and AG-CX370 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. AG-CX370: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and AG-CX370 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. AG-CX370: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 520 shots for the AG-CX370, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and AG-CX370 at $6,995. The EOS R6 Mark II is $4,496 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs AG-CX370 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.