Canon
XF605
1-inch broadcast camcorder with DIGIC DV7, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC, 12G-SDI, ND filter, and RTMP/SRT streaming.
$4,500
Launch priceReleased Aug 2021
Sony
Alpha 7 IV
33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
Alpha 7 IV is 3 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF605
Wins
Alpha 7 IV
6 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 200 frames)
- BAlpha 7 IV has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 8.29 MP)
- AXF605 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 10 fps)
- AXF605 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- AXF605 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,686,400)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareXF605
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Alpha 7 IV
131 × 96 × 80 mm
658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)
XF605 is 5mm shorter and 8mm thinner than Alpha 7 IV but it is also 3mm wider.
XF605 is 78 g lighter than Alpha 7 IV.
Depth (front-to-back): 72mm XF605 · 80mm Alpha 7 IV
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
XF605
134 × 91 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 IV
131 × 96 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
XF605
134 × 72 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Alpha 7 IV
131 × 80 mm
Sensor size, to scale
XF605
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
Alpha 7 IV
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
XF605: mount data unavailable
Alpha 7 IV
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
XF605
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
Burst (electronic)
30 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only XF605 supports it
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds ProRes
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7 IV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8
RAW buffer depth
828 frames vs 200 frames — higher is better
Resolution
33 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
Subject recognition
Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A
Battery life (CIPA)
580 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 51,200
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 600 Mbps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF605
Pros
- ✓4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC internal
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF + iTR AF X
- ✓12G-SDI + HDMI + Ethernet (SRT)
- ✓Built-in 3-position ND + HLG/PQ
- ✓Dual SD + RTMP streaming
Cons
- –Large shoulder-style body
- –Premium broadcast pricing
- –Fixed 15x zoom lens
- –8.29MP effective on 1-inch sensor
Alpha 7 IV
Pros
- ✓33MP — more detail for cropping and print
- ✓10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
- ✓Full-size HDMI port
- ✓759 phase-detect AF points
Cons
- –4K 60p requires Super35 crop
- –10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
- –Complex menu system
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF605 and Alpha 7 IV at major authorized retailers.
Canon XF605
Sony Alpha 7 IV
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, XF605 or Alpha 7 IV?
Alpha 7 IV scores 9.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for XF605 — 33MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the XF605 and Alpha 7 IV?
XF605 is 8.29 MP and Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the XF605 and Alpha 7 IV have in-body image stabilization?
XF605 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the XF605 or the Alpha 7 IV?
XF605 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the XF605 and Alpha 7 IV?
XF605 weighs 580 g and Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g, so the XF605 is 78 g lighter.
Do the XF605 and Alpha 7 IV record 4K video?
XF605: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p.
Are the XF605 and Alpha 7 IV weather sealed?
XF605: Yes. Alpha 7 IV: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the XF605 and 580 shots for the Alpha 7 IV, giving the Alpha 7 IV the edge.
How much does each cost?
XF605 launched at $4,500 and Alpha 7 IV at $2,499. The Alpha 7 IV is $2,001 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way XF605 vs Alpha 7 IV vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.