Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Canon

XF605

1-inch broadcast camcorder with DIGIC DV7, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC, 12G-SDI, ND filter, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$4,500

Launch price

Released Aug 2021

EOS R1 is 3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

XF605

Sports & ActionWildlife

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 4 categories·XF605 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 8.29 MP)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 520 shots)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 5,760,000)
  • BXF605 has lower Weight (580 g vs 920 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1XF605
Resolution24.2 MP8.29 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stop8-stop
Weight920 g580 g
Battery1330 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

XF605

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

EOS R1 is 24mm wider, 59mm taller, and 15mm thicker than XF605.

EOS R1 is 340 g heavier than XF605.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 72mm XF605

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

XF605

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

XF605

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

XF605

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

XF605: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1XF605
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 5,760,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

XF605

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    580 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

XF605

Pros

  • 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC internal
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF + iTR AF X
  • 12G-SDI + HDMI + Ethernet (SRT)
  • Built-in 3-position ND + HLG/PQ
  • Dual SD + RTMP streaming

Cons

  • Large shoulder-style body
  • Premium broadcast pricing
  • Fixed 15x zoom lens
  • 8.29MP effective on 1-inch sensor

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and XF605 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
XF605
Resolution
24.2 MP2.9× more
8.29 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R1
XF605
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
DIGIC DV7
EOS R1
XF605
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
XF605
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R1 or XF605?

EOS R1 scores 7.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for XF605 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and XF605?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and XF605 is 8.29 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and XF605 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while XF605 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the XF605?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. XF605 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and XF605?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and XF605 weighs 580 g, so the XF605 is 340 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and XF605 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. XF605: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R1 and XF605 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. XF605: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 520 shots for the XF605, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and XF605 at $4,500. The XF605 is $1,799 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs XF605 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.