Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Launch price

Released Jul 2020

vs

Canon

XF605

1-inch broadcast camcorder with DIGIC DV7, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC, 12G-SDI, ND filter, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$4,500

Launch price

Released Aug 2021

XF605 is 1.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

6categories

XF605

Sports & ActionWildlife

10 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 wins 2 categories·XF605 wins 3 categories
  • AEOS R5 has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 8.29 MP)
  • AEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • BXF605 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 20 fps)
  • BXF605 has lower Weight (580 g vs 738 g)
  • BXF605 has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 180 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5XF605
Resolution45 MP8.29 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight738 g580 g
Battery490 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

XF605

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

EOS R5 is 5mm wider, 7mm taller, and 16mm thicker than XF605.

EOS R5 is 158 g heavier than XF605.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R5 · 72mm XF605

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

XF605

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

XF605

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

XF605

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

XF605: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5XF605
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW

Reasons to choose

XF605

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only XF605 supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • Weight

    580 g vs 738 g — lower is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

XF605

Pros

  • 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC internal
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF + iTR AF X
  • 12G-SDI + HDMI + Ethernet (SRT)
  • Built-in 3-position ND + HLG/PQ
  • Dual SD + RTMP streaming

Cons

  • Large shoulder-style body
  • Premium broadcast pricing
  • Fixed 15x zoom lens
  • 8.29MP effective on 1-inch sensor

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 and XF605 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5
XF605
Resolution
45 MP5.4× more
8.29 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5
XF605
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC DV7
EOS R5
XF605
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5
XF605
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R5 or XF605?

EOS R5 scores 8.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for XF605 — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 and XF605?

EOS R5 is 45 MP and XF605 is 8.29 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 and XF605 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while XF605 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 or the XF605?

EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic. XF605 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 and XF605?

EOS R5 weighs 738 g and XF605 weighs 580 g, so the XF605 is 158 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 and XF605 record 4K video?

EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. XF605: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 and XF605 weather sealed?

EOS R5: Yes. XF605: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 490 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 and 520 shots for the XF605, giving the XF605 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 launched at $3,899 and XF605 at $4,500. The EOS R5 is $601 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 vs XF605 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.