Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

vs
FP2

Sigma

FP2

Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.

$2,199

Launch price

Released Nov 2026

FP2 is 3 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

Osmo 360 II

★ Sports & Action★ Travel

Wins

1categories

FP2

★ Portrait★ Travel

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo 360 II wins 5 categories·FP2 wins 0 categories
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 24.5 MP)
  • AOsmo 360 II has lower Weight (183 g vs 460 g)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo 360 IIFP2
Resolution120 MP24.5 MP
Sensor1/1.1 inchFull Frame
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K120 fps59.94 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight183 g460 g
Battery520 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FP2 front view

FP2

112 × 71 × 41 mm

460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)

Osmo 360 II is 76mm narrower than FP2 but it is also 10mm taller and 20mm thicker.

Osmo 360 II is 277 g lighter than FP2.

Depth (front-to-back): 61mm Osmo 360 II · 41mm FP2

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

FP2 back view

FP2

112 × 71 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Osmo 360 II

36 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

FP2 top view

FP2

112 × 41 mm

Sensor size, to scale

FP2

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo 360 IIFP2
Portrait
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
3.5Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds OSV, HEVC

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 24.5 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

FP2

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, Birds, People

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, H.264…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 71, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only FP2 supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only FP2 supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only FP2 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
  • ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
  • ✓Card slots — Both 1
  • ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • ✓Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • ✓14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • ✓User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • ✓120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • ✓105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • –Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • –100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • –10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • –US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

FP2

Pros

  • ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
  • ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
  • ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
  • ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
  • ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21

Cons

  • –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
  • –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
  • –Electronic shutter only
  • –No headphone jack (USB audio only)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo 360 II and FP2 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

Osmo 360 II
FP2
Resolution
120 MP✓4.9× more
24.5 MP
Sensor type
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
Partially Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.1 inch
35.9 x 23.9
AA filter
No
No
Osmo 360 II
FP2
Aperture
f/1.9
—
Osmo 360 II
FP2
Processor
High-performance ISP
Sigma image processor
Osmo 360 II
FP2
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
102,400✓+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
Osmo 360 II
FP2
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
—
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/25600 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Osmo 360 II or FP2?

Osmo 360 II scores 10.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for FP2 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo 360 II and FP2?

Osmo 360 II is 120 MP and FP2 is 24.5 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo 360 II and FP2?

Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while FP2 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo 360 II or the FP2?

Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic. FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo 360 II and FP2?

Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g and FP2 weighs 460 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 277 g lighter.

Do the Osmo 360 II and FP2 record 4K video?

Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p. FP2: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the Osmo 360 II and FP2 weather sealed?

Osmo 360 II: Yes. FP2: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo 360 II and 370 shots for the FP2, giving the Osmo 360 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo 360 II launched at $599 and FP2 at $2,199. The Osmo 360 II is $1,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo 360 II vs FP2 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Sigma press materials.