
DJI
Osmo 360 II
Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.
$599
Launch priceReleased Aug 2026

Sigma
FP2
Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2026
FP2 is 3 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
Osmo 360 II
Wins
FP2
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AOsmo 360 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
- AOsmo 360 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 24.5 MP)
- AOsmo 360 II has lower Weight (183 g vs 460 g)
- AOsmo 360 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
Osmo 360 II
36 × 81 × 61 mm
183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale

FP2
112 × 71 × 41 mm
460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)
Osmo 360 II is 76mm narrower than FP2 but it is also 10mm taller and 20mm thicker.
Osmo 360 II is 277 g lighter than FP2.
Depth (front-to-back): 61mm Osmo 360 II · 41mm FP2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
Osmo 360 II
36 × 81 mm

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm

FP2
112 × 71 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
Osmo 360 II
36 × 61 mm

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm

FP2
112 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
FP2
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Osmo 360 II
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds OSV, HEVC
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 36.3, 81, 61
Card types
Adds microSD
Resolution
120 MP vs 24.5 MP — higher is better
Reasons to choose
FP2
Subject recognition
Adds Animals, Birds, People
Codecs
Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, H.264…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112, 71, 41
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better
Eye AF
Only FP2 supports it
Animal / bird AF
Only FP2 supports it
Internal RAW video
Only FP2 supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Osmo 360 II
Pros
- ✓Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
- ✓14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
- ✓User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
- ✓120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
- ✓105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect
Cons
- –Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
- –100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
- –10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
- –US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)
FP2
Pros
- ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
- ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
- ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
- ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
- ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21
Cons
- –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
- –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
- –Electronic shutter only
- –No headphone jack (USB audio only)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Osmo 360 II and FP2 at major authorized retailers.
DJI Osmo 360 II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, Osmo 360 II or FP2?
Osmo 360 II scores 10.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for FP2 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the Osmo 360 II and FP2?
Osmo 360 II is 120 MP and FP2 is 24.5 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
How does stabilization compare between the Osmo 360 II and FP2?
Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while FP2 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo 360 II or the FP2?
Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic. FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the Osmo 360 II and FP2?
Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g and FP2 weighs 460 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 277 g lighter.
Do the Osmo 360 II and FP2 record 4K video?
Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p. FP2: 4K up to 59.94p.
Are the Osmo 360 II and FP2 weather sealed?
Osmo 360 II: Yes. FP2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo 360 II and 370 shots for the FP2, giving the Osmo 360 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
Osmo 360 II launched at $599 and FP2 at $2,199. The Osmo 360 II is $1,600 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo 360 II vs FP2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of DJI and Sigma press materials.