Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Sigma
FP2
Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2026
FP2 is 4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
FP2
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 370 shots)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FP2
112 × 71 × 41 mm
460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 26mm wider, 27mm taller, and 47mm thicker than FP2.
EOS R6 Mark II is 210 g heavier than FP2.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 41mm FP2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FP2
112 × 71 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FP2
112 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
FP2
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
FP2: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
Subject recognition
Adds Dogs, Cats, Horses…
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 370 shots — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
FP2
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112, 71, 41
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Codecs
Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ
Subject recognition
Adds Animals
Weight
460 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Resolution
24.5 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 102,400
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓RAW buffer depth — Both 180 frames
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
FP2
Pros
- ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
- ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
- ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
- ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
- ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21
Cons
- –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
- –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
- –Electronic shutter only
- –No headphone jack (USB audio only)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and FP2 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or FP2?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for FP2 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and FP2?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and FP2 is 24.5 MP, so the FP2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and FP2 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while FP2 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the FP2?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and FP2?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and FP2 weighs 460 g, so the FP2 is 210 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and FP2 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. FP2: 4K up to 59.94p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and FP2 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. FP2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 370 shots for the FP2, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and FP2 at $2,199. The FP2 is $300 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs FP2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sigma press materials.