Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

DJI

Osmo Pocket 3

Pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch sensor, 4K 120p, and rotating 2-inch OLED screen.

$519

Released Oct 2023

vs

Insta360

ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition

Modular 360 system with dual 1-inch Leica co-engineered sensors, 6K 360 video, 21MP photos, and best-in-class low light for 360.

$999

Released Jun 2022

Osmo Pocket 3 is 1.4 years newer.

Wins

4categories

Osmo Pocket 3

Wins

4categories

ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition

TravelVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Pocket 3 wins 3 categories·ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition wins 2 categories
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher ISO max (native) (16,000 vs 3,200)
  • BONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition has higher Resolution (21 MP vs 9.4 MP)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo Pocket 3ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
Resolution9.4 MP21 MP
Sensor1 inch1 inch
ISO max16,0003,200
Burst15 fps20 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight179 g239 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Pocket 3

140 × 42 × 34 mm

179 g (0.39 lb / 6.31 oz)

ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition

53 × 129 × 50 mm

239 g (0.53 lb / 8.43 oz)

Osmo Pocket 3 is 87mm shorter and 16mm thinner than ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition but it is also 86mm wider.

Osmo Pocket 3 is 60 g lighter than ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition.

Depth (front-to-back): 34mm Osmo Pocket 3 · 50mm ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo Pocket 3ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
Portrait
1.0Limited
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
3.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.7, 42.2, 33.5

  • ISO max (native)

    16,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    179 g vs 239 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 53.2, 129.3, 49.5

  • Resolution

    21 MP vs 9.4 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • Weather sealing

    Only ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition supports it

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition supports it

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Max video bit rateBoth 200 Mbps
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Pocket 3

Pros

  • Built-in 3-axis gimbal
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Creator-friendly

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Small sensor vs ILC
  • Accessory dependent

ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition

Pros

  • Dual 1-inch sensors
  • 6K 360 video
  • Leica imaging
  • Modular ONE RS platform

Cons

  • IPX3 only (not submersible)
  • Heavy modular setup
  • 62 min runtime at 6K30

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Pocket 3
ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
Resolution
9.4 MP
21 MP2.2× more
Sensor type
1-inch CMOS
Dual 1-inch CMOS (Leica co-engineered)
Sensor size
1 inch
1 inch
Osmo Pocket 3
ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
AF system
Contrast detection AF
Fixed focus
AF points / zones
0
Eye AF
No
No
Animal / bird AF
No
No
Subject recognition
Osmo Pocket 3
ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
8 fps+33%
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
20 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
120 frames2× more
Osmo Pocket 3
ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
Max resolution
4K UHD
6K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
Log profile supported
Codecs
H.264
H.264, H.265
Osmo Pocket 3
ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition
Weight
179 g−60 g less
239 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
139.7 × 42.2 × 33.5 mm
53.2 × 129.3 × 49.5 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Osmo Pocket 3 or ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition?

ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition scores 6.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 3 — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition?

Osmo Pocket 3 is 9.4 MP and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition is 21 MP, so the ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition have in-body image stabilization?

Osmo Pocket 3 does not have IBIS, while oNE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo Pocket 3 or the ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition?

Osmo Pocket 3 reaches 15 fps electronic. ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition?

Osmo Pocket 3 weighs 179 g and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition weighs 239 g, so the Osmo Pocket 3 is 60 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition record 4K video?

Osmo Pocket 3: 4K up to 60p. ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition: 6K (max), 4K up to 30p.

Are the Osmo Pocket 3 and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition weather sealed?

Osmo Pocket 3: No. ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo Pocket 3 and 640 shots for the ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition, giving the ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Pocket 3 launched at $519 and ONE RS 1-Inch 360 Edition at $999. The Osmo Pocket 3 is $480 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.