Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
DJI
Osmo Pocket 3
Pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch sensor, 4K 120p, and rotating 2-inch OLED screen.
$519
Launch priceReleased Oct 2023
Osmo Pocket 3 is 11 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
Osmo Pocket 3
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
- BOsmo Pocket 3 has lower Weight (179 g vs 670 g)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 130 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP)
- BOsmo Pocket 3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo Pocket 3
34 × 140 × 42 mm
179 g (0.39 lb / 6.31 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 41mm shorter than Osmo Pocket 3 but it is also 105mm wider and 46mm thicker.
EOS R6 Mark II is 491 g heavier than Osmo Pocket 3.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 42mm Osmo Pocket 3
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Pocket 3
34 × 140 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Pocket 3
34 × 42 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Osmo Pocket 3
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo Pocket 3: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 130 Mbps — higher is better
Resolution
24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Eye AF
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo Pocket 3
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 33.5, 139.7, 42.2
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
179 g vs 670 g — lower is better
ISO min (native)
50 vs 100 — lower is better
Codecs
Adds HEVC
Both cameras share
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
Osmo Pocket 3
Pros
- ✓Built-in 3-axis gimbal
- ✓1-inch sensor
- ✓Creator-friendly
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –Small sensor vs ILC
- –Accessory dependent
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
DJI Osmo Pocket 3
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo Pocket 3?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 3 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Pocket 3 is 9.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Pocket 3 uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Osmo Pocket 3 weighs 179 g, so the Osmo Pocket 3 is 491 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo Pocket 3: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Pocket 3: No.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Osmo Pocket 3 at $519. The Osmo Pocket 3 is $1,980 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Osmo Pocket 3 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.