Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

DJI

Osmo Pocket 3

Pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch sensor, 4K 120p, and rotating 2-inch OLED screen.

$519

Released Oct 2023

Osmo Pocket 3 is 11 months newer.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

Osmo Pocket 3

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·Osmo Pocket 3 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 16,000)
  • BOsmo Pocket 3 has lower Weight (179 g vs 680 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIOsmo Pocket 3
Resolution24.2 MP9.4 MP
SensorFull Frame1 inch
ISO max102,40016,000
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g179 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Osmo Pocket 3

140 × 42 × 34 mm

179 g (0.39 lb / 6.31 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 1mm narrower than Osmo Pocket 3 but it is also 56mm taller and 55mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 501 g heavier than Osmo Pocket 3.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 34mm Osmo Pocket 3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Osmo Pocket 3

140 × 42 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Osmo Pocket 3

140 × 34 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo Pocket 3: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIOsmo Pocket 3
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 16,000 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.7, 42.2, 33.5

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    179 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Osmo Pocket 3

Pros

  • Built-in 3-axis gimbal
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Creator-friendly

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Small sensor vs ILC
  • Accessory dependent

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 3
Resolution
24.2 MP2.6× more
9.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 3
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast detection AF
AF points / zones
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 3
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames3× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 3
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps+70%
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 3
Weight
680 g
179 g−501 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
139.7 × 42.2 × 33.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo Pocket 3?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 3 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Pocket 3 is 9.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while osmo Pocket 3 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Osmo Pocket 3?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Pocket 3 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Osmo Pocket 3 weighs 179 g, so the Osmo Pocket 3 is 501 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo Pocket 3: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 3 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Pocket 3: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the Osmo Pocket 3, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Osmo Pocket 3 at $519. The Osmo Pocket 3 is $1,980 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.