Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

DJI

Osmo Pocket 3

Pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch sensor, 4K 120p, and rotating 2-inch OLED screen.

$519

Released Oct 2023

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S5 II

Phase-detect L-mount hybrid with 6K open gate and strong video tools.

$1,999

Released Jan 2023

Osmo Pocket 3 is 10 months newer.

Wins

3categories

Osmo Pocket 3

Wins

6categories

Lumix S5 II

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Pocket 3 wins 2 categories·Lumix S5 II wins 3 categories
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has lower Weight (179 g vs 740 g)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 16,000)
  • BLumix S5 II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo Pocket 3Lumix S5 II
Resolution9.4 MP24.2 MP
Sensor1 inchFull Frame
ISO max16,00051,200
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo5-stop
Weight179 g740 g
Battery640 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Pocket 3

140 × 42 × 34 mm

179 g (0.39 lb / 6.31 oz)

Lumix S5 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)

Osmo Pocket 3 is 60mm shorter and 57mm thinner than Lumix S5 II but it is also 5mm wider.

Osmo Pocket 3 is 561 g lighter than Lumix S5 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 34mm Osmo Pocket 3 · 90mm Lumix S5 II

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix S5 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo Pocket 3Lumix S5 II
Portrait
1.0Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.0Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.7, 42.2, 33.5

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    179 g vs 740 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only Osmo Pocket 3 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 370 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S5 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, MOV, MP4

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 16,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only Lumix S5 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 200 Mbps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Pocket 3

Pros

  • Built-in 3-axis gimbal
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Creator-friendly

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Small sensor vs ILC
  • Accessory dependent

Lumix S5 II

Pros

  • Phase-detect AF finally
  • 6K open gate
  • IBIS
  • Great value

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • L-mount size
  • AF still behind Canon/Sony

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Pocket 3
Lumix S5 II
Resolution
9.4 MP
24.2 MP2.6× more
Sensor type
1-inch CMOS
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
Sensor size
1 inch
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Osmo Pocket 3
Lumix S5 II
AF system
Contrast detection AF
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Osmo Pocket 3
Lumix S5 II
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
9 fps+50%
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
30 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
200 frames3.3× more
Osmo Pocket 3
Lumix S5 II
Max resolution
4K UHD
6K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
V-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.264
H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
Osmo Pocket 3
Lumix S5 II
Weight
179 g−561 g less
740 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
139.7 × 42.2 × 33.5 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, Osmo Pocket 3 or Lumix S5 II?

Lumix S5 II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 3 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and Lumix S5 II?

Osmo Pocket 3 is 9.4 MP and Lumix S5 II is 24.2 MP, so the Lumix S5 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and Lumix S5 II have in-body image stabilization?

Osmo Pocket 3 does not have IBIS, while lumix S5 II has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo Pocket 3 or the Lumix S5 II?

Osmo Pocket 3 reaches 15 fps electronic. Lumix S5 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and Lumix S5 II?

Osmo Pocket 3 weighs 179 g and Lumix S5 II weighs 740 g, so the Osmo Pocket 3 is 561 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and Lumix S5 II record 4K video?

Osmo Pocket 3: 4K up to 60p. Lumix S5 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Osmo Pocket 3 and Lumix S5 II weather sealed?

Osmo Pocket 3: No. Lumix S5 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo Pocket 3 and 370 shots for the Lumix S5 II, giving the Osmo Pocket 3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Pocket 3 launched at $519 and Lumix S5 II at $1,999. The Osmo Pocket 3 is $1,480 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.