Fujifilm
GFX100 II
102MP medium format flagship for studio, fashion, and landscape.
$7,499
Released Sep 2023
Fujifilm
X-T4
Previous-gen APS-C flagship still popular for video and stills.
$1,699
Released Feb 2020
GFX100 II is 3.6 years newer.
Wins
GFX100 II
Wins
X-T4
6 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGFX100 II has higher RAW buffer depth (325 frames vs 35 frames)
- BX-T4 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 5.3 fps)
- AGFX100 II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 26.1 MP)
- AGFX100 II has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 3,690,000)
- AGFX100 II has lower ISO min (native) (80 vs 160)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GFX100 II
152 × 117 × 99 mm
1030 g (2.27 lb / 36.33 oz)
X-T4
135 × 93 × 64 mm
607 g (1.34 lb / 21.41 oz)
GFX100 II is 18mm wider, 25mm taller, and 35mm thicker than X-T4.
GFX100 II is 423 g heavier than X-T4.
Depth (front-to-back): 99mm GFX100 II · 64mm X-T4
Sensor size, to scale
GFX100 II
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
X-T4
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
GFX100 II: mount data unavailable
X-T4
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GFX100 II
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 152.4, 117.4, 98.6
RAW buffer depth
325 frames vs 35 frames — higher is better
Resolution
102 MP vs 26.1 MP — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SSD via USB
EVF resolution
9,440,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT
ISO min (native)
80 vs 160 — lower is better
Reasons to choose
X-T4
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -5.5 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134.6, 92.8, 63.8
Burst (electronic)
30 fps vs 5.3 fps — higher is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only X-T4 supports it
Card types
Adds SDXC V90
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better
Weight
607 g vs 1030 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GFX100 II
Pros
- ✓102MP medium format
- ✓Stunning detail
- ✓Pro video
Cons
- –Very expensive
- –Large files
- –Slow operation feel
X-T4
Pros
- ✓IBIS
- ✓Dual slots
- ✓Film sims
Cons
- –Superseded by X-T5
- –26MP vs 40MP new models
- –Older AF
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, GFX100 II or X-T4?
GFX100 II scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for X-T4 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.
What's the resolution difference between the GFX100 II and X-T4?
GFX100 II is 102 MP and X-T4 is 26.1 MP, so the GFX100 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GFX100 II and X-T4 have in-body image stabilization?
GFX100 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T4 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100 II or the X-T4?
GFX100 II reaches 8 fps mechanical. X-T4 reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the GFX100 II and X-T4?
GFX100 II weighs 1030 g and X-T4 weighs 607 g, so the X-T4 is 423 g lighter.
Do the GFX100 II and X-T4 record 4K video?
GFX100 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-T4: 4K up to 60p.
Are the GFX100 II and X-T4 weather sealed?
GFX100 II: Yes. X-T4: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100 II and 500 shots for the X-T4, giving the GFX100 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
GFX100 II launched at $7,499 and X-T4 at $1,699. The X-T4 is $5,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.