Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-H2

40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.

$1,999

Released Sep 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-T4

Previous-gen APS-C flagship still popular for video and stills.

$1,699

Released Feb 2020

X-H2 is 2.5 years newer.

Wins

8categories

X-H2

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

X-T4

TravelSports & Action

8 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2 wins 4 categories·X-T4 wins 1 categories
  • AX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 35 frames)
  • AX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 400 Mbps)
  • AX-H2 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
  • AX-H2 has higher Resolution (40.2 MP vs 26.1 MP)
  • BX-T4 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2X-T4
Resolution40.2 MP26.1 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop6.5-stop
Weight660 g607 g
Battery540 shots500 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

X-T4

135 × 93 × 64 mm

607 g (1.34 lb / 21.41 oz)

X-H2 is 2mm wider and 21mm thicker than X-T4.

X-H2 is 53 g heavier than X-T4.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2 · 64mm X-T4

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

X-T4

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-T4

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2X-T4
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • RAW buffer depth

    202 frames vs 35 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only X-H2 supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only X-H2 supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only X-H2 supports it

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 400 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.6, 92.8, 63.8

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    607 g vs 660 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 15 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2

Pros

  • 40MP APS-C
  • 8K video
  • IBIS

Cons

  • APS-C
  • Large files
  • Complex video modes

X-T4

Pros

  • IBIS
  • Dual slots
  • Film sims

Cons

  • Superseded by X-T5
  • 26MP vs 40MP new models
  • Older AF

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2
X-T4
Resolution
40.2 MP+54%
26.1 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2
X-T4
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
X-H2
X-T4
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps
15 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
30 fps+50%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
202 frames5.8× more
35 frames
X-H2
X-T4
Max resolution
8K
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps+80%
400 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
F-Log
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
X-H2
X-T4
Weight
660 g
607 g−53 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm
134.6 × 92.8 × 63.8 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, X-H2 or X-T4?

X-H2 scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for X-T4 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2 and X-T4?

X-H2 is 40.2 MP and X-T4 is 26.1 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2 and X-T4 have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T4 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2 or the X-T4?

X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic. X-T4 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2 and X-T4?

X-H2 weighs 660 g and X-T4 weighs 607 g, so the X-T4 is 53 g lighter.

Do the X-H2 and X-T4 record 4K video?

X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-T4: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-H2 and X-T4 weather sealed?

X-H2: Yes. X-T4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2 and 500 shots for the X-T4, giving the X-H2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2 launched at $1,999 and X-T4 at $1,699. The X-T4 is $300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.