Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-H2
40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.
$1,999
Released Sep 2022
EOS R6 Mark II is 2 months newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-H2
4 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
- BX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
- BX-H2 has higher Resolution (40.2 MP vs 24.2 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
X-H2
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 2mm wider, 6mm taller, and 4mm thicker than X-H2.
EOS R6 Mark II is 20 g heavier than X-H2.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 85mm X-H2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
X-H2
136 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
X-H2
136 × 85 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-H2
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-H2
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 425 — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 540 shots — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 125 — lower is better
Reasons to choose
X-H2
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SDXC V90
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Resolution
40.2 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-H2
Pros
- ✓40MP APS-C
- ✓8K video
- ✓IBIS
Cons
- –APS-C
- –Large files
- –Complex video modes
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, EOS R6 Mark II or X-H2?
X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R6 Mark II — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H2?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-H2 is 40.2 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H2 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-H2?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H2?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-H2 weighs 660 g, so the X-H2 is 20 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H2 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H2 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-H2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 540 shots for the X-H2, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-H2 at $1,999. The X-H2 is $500 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.