Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

GFX100S II

Compact 102MP GFX medium format body with X-Processor 5, 8-stop IBIS, and updated subject detection.

$4,999

Released May 2024

vs

Fujifilm

X100T

Third-generation X100 with refined hybrid viewfinder and classic 16MP X-Trans output.

$1,299

Released Sep 2014

GFX100S II is 9.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

GFX100S II

LandscapeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

X100T

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX100S II wins 5 categories·X100T wins 0 categories
  • AGFX100S II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AGFX100S II has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
  • AGFX100S II has higher RAW buffer depth (96 frames vs 8 frames)
  • AGFX100S II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 16.3 MP)
  • AGFX100S II has lower ISO min (native) (80 vs 200)

Key specs at a glance

GFX100S IIX100T
Resolution102 MP16.3 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,8006,400
Burst7 fps6 fps
4K30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight883 g440 g
Battery530 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GFX100S II

150 × 104 × 87 mm

883 g (1.95 lb / 31.15 oz)

X100T

127 × 74 × 52 mm

440 g (0.97 lb / 15.52 oz)

GFX100S II is 24mm wider, 30mm taller, and 35mm thicker than X100T.

GFX100S II is 443 g heavier than X100T.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm GFX100S II · 52mm X100T

Sensor size, to scale

GFX100S II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

X100T

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX100S IIX100T
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
4.0Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
4.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX100S II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 104.2, 87.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SDXC V90, SSD via USB

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    96 frames vs 8 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 16.3 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

Reasons to choose

X100T

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.5, 74.4, 52.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    440 g vs 883 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    6 fps vs 4.1 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX100S II

Pros

  • 102MP medium format sensor
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • X-Processor 5
  • Compact for GFX

Cons

  • Large files
  • Premium price
  • Medium format AF not for sports

X100T

Pros

  • Hybrid viewfinder
  • Classic X100 controls
  • Leaf shutter

Cons

  • 16MP
  • No 4K
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GFX100S II and X100T at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GFX100S II
X100T
Resolution
102 MP6.3× more
16.3 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II
APS-C X-Trans CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.6 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX100S II
X100T
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Human
GFX100S II
X100T
Burst (mechanical)
7 fps+17%
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
4.1 fps
6 fps+46%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
96 frames12× more
8 frames
GFX100S II
X100T
Max resolution
4K
Full HD
4K max frame rate
30 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps20× more
36 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.264
GFX100S II
X100T
Weight
883 g
440 g−443 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
150 × 104.2 × 87.2 mm
126.5 × 74.4 × 52.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, GFX100S II or X100T?

GFX100S II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for X100T — 102MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX100S II and X100T?

GFX100S II is 102 MP and X100T is 16.3 MP, so the GFX100S II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GFX100S II and X100T have in-body image stabilization?

GFX100S II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x100T does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100S II or the X100T?

GFX100S II reaches 7 fps mechanical. X100T reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GFX100S II and X100T?

GFX100S II weighs 883 g and X100T weighs 440 g, so the X100T is 443 g lighter.

Do the GFX100S II and X100T record 4K video?

GFX100S II: 4K up to 30p. X100T: Full HD.

Are the GFX100S II and X100T weather sealed?

GFX100S II: Yes. X100T: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 530 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100S II and 330 shots for the X100T, giving the GFX100S II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX100S II launched at $4,999 and X100T at $1,299. The X100T is $3,700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.