Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X100T

Third-generation X100 with refined hybrid viewfinder and classic 16MP X-Trans output.

$1,299

Released Sep 2014

EOS R6 Mark II is 8.2 years newer.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

1categories

X100T

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·X100T wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 8 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX100T
Resolution24.2 MP16.3 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,4006,400
Burst40 fps6 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g440 g
Battery760 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

X100T

127 × 74 × 52 mm

440 g (0.97 lb / 15.52 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 24mm taller, and 36mm thicker than X100T.

EOS R6 Mark II is 240 g heavier than X100T.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 52mm X100T

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

X100T

127 × 74 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

X100T

127 × 52 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X100T

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X100T: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX100T
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 8 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X100T

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.5, 74.4, 52.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    440 g vs 680 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X100T

Pros

  • Hybrid viewfinder
  • Classic X100 controls
  • Leaf shutter

Cons

  • 16MP
  • No 4K
  • Older AF

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X100T
Resolution
24.2 MP+48%
16.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.6 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X100T
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human
EOS R6 Mark II
X100T
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps6.7× more
6 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames22.5× more
8 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
X100T
Max resolution
4K UHD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps9.4× more
36 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
X100T
Weight
680 g
440 g−240 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
126.5 × 74.4 × 52.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or X100T?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for X100T — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100T?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X100T is 16.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100T have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x100T does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X100T?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X100T reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100T?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X100T weighs 440 g, so the X100T is 240 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100T record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X100T: Full HD.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X100T weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X100T: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 330 shots for the X100T, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X100T at $1,299. The X100T is $1,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.