Fujifilm
GFX100S
102MP medium format in a more compact GFX body.
$5,999
Released Jan 2021
Fujifilm
X100V
Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.
$1,399
Released Feb 2020
GFX100S is 1 year newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GFX100S
Wins
X100V
5 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGFX100S has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
- BX100V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 2.9 fps)
- AGFX100S has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 26.1 MP)
- BX100V has higher Burst (mechanical) (11 fps vs 5 fps)
- AGFX100S has higher Max video bit rate (400 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GFX100S
150 × 104 × 87 mm
900 g (1.98 lb / 31.75 oz)
X100V
128 × 75 × 53 mm
478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)
GFX100S is 22mm wider, 29mm taller, and 34mm thicker than X100V.
GFX100S is 422 g heavier than X100V.
Depth (front-to-back): 87mm GFX100S · 53mm X100V
Sensor size, to scale
GFX100S
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
X100V
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GFX100S
IBIS effectiveness
6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 150, 104.2, 87.2
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SDXC V90
Resolution
102 MP vs 26.1 MP — higher is better
Max video bit rate
400 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds H.265
In-body stabilization
Only GFX100S supports it
Card slots
2 vs 1 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X100V
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Burst (electronic)
30 fps vs 2.9 fps — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
11 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only X100V supports it
Weight
478 g vs 900 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 30 fps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GFX100S
Pros
- ✓102MP
- ✓IBIS
- ✓Medium format quality
Cons
- –Price
- –Slow AF
- –Huge files
X100V
Pros
- ✓Classic design
- ✓Leaf shutter
- ✓Film simulations
- ✓Proven street camera
Cons
- –Superseded by X100VI
- –Fixed lens
- –No IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GFX100S and X100V at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GFX100S
Fujifilm X100V
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, GFX100S or X100V?
X100V scores 6.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for GFX100S — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the GFX100S and X100V?
GFX100S is 102 MP and X100V is 26.1 MP, so the GFX100S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GFX100S and X100V have in-body image stabilization?
GFX100S has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while x100V does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100S or the X100V?
GFX100S reaches 5 fps mechanical. X100V reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the GFX100S and X100V?
GFX100S weighs 900 g and X100V weighs 478 g, so the X100V is 422 g lighter.
Do the GFX100S and X100V record 4K video?
GFX100S: 4K up to 30p. X100V: 4K up to 30p.
Are the GFX100S and X100V weather sealed?
GFX100S: Yes. X100V: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 460 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100S and 350 shots for the X100V, giving the GFX100S the edge.
How much does each cost?
GFX100S launched at $5,999 and X100V at $1,399. The X100V is $4,600 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.