Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X100V

Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.

$1,399

Released Feb 2020

EOS R6 Mark II is 2.8 years newer.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

X100V

Sports & ActionTravel

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·X100V wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 17 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 350 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX100V
Resolution24.2 MP26.1 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g478 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

X100V

128 × 75 × 53 mm

478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 10mm wider, 24mm taller, and 35mm thicker than X100V.

EOS R6 Mark II is 202 g heavier than X100V.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 53mm X100V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

X100V

128 × 75 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

X100V

128 × 53 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X100V

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X100V: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX100V
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 17 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X100V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    478 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    26.1 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • EVF resolutionBoth 3,690,000
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X100V

Pros

  • Classic design
  • Leaf shutter
  • Film simulations
  • Proven street camera

Cons

  • Superseded by X100VI
  • Fixed lens
  • No IBIS

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X100V
Resolution
24.2 MP
26.1 MP+8%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X100V
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R6 Mark II
X100V
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+9%
11 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames10.6× more
17 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
X100V
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps+70%
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
F-Log
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
X100V
Weight
680 g
478 g−202 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
128 × 74.8 × 53.3 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R6 Mark II or X100V?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for X100V — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100V?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X100V is 26.1 MP, so the X100V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100V have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x100V does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X100V?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X100V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100V?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X100V weighs 478 g, so the X100V is 202 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100V record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X100V: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X100V weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X100V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the X100V, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X100V at $1,399. The X100V is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.