Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

GFX50S II

Affordable medium format entry with 51MP and IBIS.

$3,999

Released Sep 2021

vs

Fujifilm

X-H2

40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.

$1,999

Released Sep 2022

X-H2 is 1 year newer.

Wins

2categories

GFX50S II

Landscape

Wins

10categories

X-H2

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX50S II wins 0 categories·X-H2 wins 5 categories
  • BX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • BX-H2 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 2.2 fps)
  • BX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 35 frames)
  • BX-H2 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 3 fps)
  • BX-H2 has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 117)

Key specs at a glance

GFX50S IIX-H2
Resolution51.4 MP40.2 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst3 fps20 fps
IBIS6.5-stop7-stop
Weight900 g660 g
Battery455 shots540 shots
4K60 fps

Size and weight, to scale

GFX50S II

150 × 104 × 87 mm

900 g (1.98 lb / 31.75 oz)

X-H2

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

GFX50S II is 14mm wider, 11mm taller, and 3mm thicker than X-H2.

GFX50S II is 240 g heavier than X-H2.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm GFX50S II · 85mm X-H2

Sensor size, to scale

GFX50S II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

X-H2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GFX50S II: mount data unavailable

X-H2

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX50S IIX-H2
Portrait
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Travel
5.0Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
1.5Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX50S II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 104.2, 87.2

  • Resolution

    51.4 MP vs 40.2 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 125 — lower is better

Reasons to choose

X-H2

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 2.2 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    202 frames vs 35 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 3 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 117 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX50S II

Pros

  • Medium format under $4K
  • IBIS
  • Great color

Cons

  • Slower AF
  • Large body
  • Limited lens selection vs FF

X-H2

Pros

  • 40MP APS-C
  • 8K video
  • IBIS

Cons

  • APS-C
  • Large files
  • Complex video modes

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GFX50S II and X-H2 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

GFX50S II
X-H2
Resolution
51.4 MP+28%
40.2 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format Bayer CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX50S II
X-H2
AF system
TTL Contrast AF
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
117
4253.6× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
GFX50S II
X-H2
Burst (mechanical)
3 fps
15 fps5× more
Burst (electronic)
2.2 fps
20 fps9.1× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
35 frames
202 frames5.8× more
GFX50S II
X-H2
Max resolution
Full HD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
Max video bit rate
50 Mbps
720 Mbps14.4× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
None
F-Log / F-Log2
Codecs
H.264
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
GFX50S II
X-H2
Weight
900 g
660 g−240 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
150 × 104.2 × 87.2 mm
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, GFX50S II or X-H2?

X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for GFX50S II — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX50S II and X-H2?

GFX50S II is 51.4 MP and X-H2 is 40.2 MP, so the GFX50S II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GFX50S II and X-H2 have in-body image stabilization?

GFX50S II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX50S II or the X-H2?

GFX50S II reaches 3 fps mechanical. X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GFX50S II and X-H2?

GFX50S II weighs 900 g and X-H2 weighs 660 g, so the X-H2 is 240 g lighter.

Do the GFX50S II and X-H2 record 4K video?

GFX50S II: Full HD. X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the GFX50S II and X-H2 weather sealed?

GFX50S II: Yes. X-H2: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 455 shots (CIPA) for the GFX50S II and 540 shots for the X-H2, giving the X-H2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX50S II launched at $3,999 and X-H2 at $1,999. The X-H2 is $2,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.