Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X-E5

Compact rangefinder-style X-mount body with 40MP X-Trans CMOS 5 HR, 7-stop IBIS, and 6.2K video.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jun 2025

vs
X-H2

Fujifilm

X-H2

40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2022

X-E5 is 2.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

X-E5

WildlifePortrait

Wins

7categories

X-H2

WildlifeSports & Action

10 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X-E5 wins 0 categories·X-H2 wins 5 categories
  • BX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 66 frames)
  • BX-H2 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BX-H2 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • BX-H2 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 8 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-E5X-H2
Resolution40.2 MP40.2 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst20 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop7-stop
Weight445 g660 g
Battery310 shots540 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-E5

125 × 73 × 39 mm

445 g (0.98 lb / 15.70 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X-H2 front view

X-H2

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

X-E5 is 11mm narrower, 20mm shorter, and 45mm thinner than X-H2.

X-E5 is 215 g lighter than X-H2.

Depth (front-to-back): 39mm X-E5 · 85mm X-H2

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X-E5

125 × 73 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X-H2 back view

X-H2

136 × 93 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X-E5

125 × 39 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X-H2 top view

X-H2

136 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X-E5

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

X-H2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-E5

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-H2

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-E5X-H2
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
7.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
4.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-E5

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 124.9, 72.9, 39.1

  • Weight

    445 g vs 660 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

X-H2

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    202 frames vs 66 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Weather sealing

    Only X-H2 supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only X-H2 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 40.2 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 125
  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-E5

Pros

  • 40MP compact X body
  • 7-stop IBIS
  • 6.2K video
  • Classic rangefinder-style design

Cons

  • Small grip
  • Single card slot
  • Premium compact body

X-H2

Pros

  • 40MP APS-C
  • 8K video
  • IBIS

Cons

  • APS-C
  • Large files
  • Complex video modes

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-E5 and X-H2 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-E5
X-H2
Resolution
40.2 MP
40.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-E5
X-H2
Processor
X-Processor 5
X-Processor 5
X-E5
X-H2
ISO min (native)
125
125
ISO max (native)
12,800
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
51,200
X-E5
X-H2
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Focal Plane Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/180000 sec
1/180000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, X-E5 or X-H2?

X-H2 scores 9.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for X-E5 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the X-E5 and X-H2?

Both cameras share the same 40.2 MP resolution.

Do the X-E5 and X-H2 have in-body image stabilization?

X-E5 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-E5 or the X-H2?

X-E5 reaches 20 fps electronic. X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-E5 and X-H2?

X-E5 weighs 445 g and X-H2 weighs 660 g, so the X-E5 is 215 g lighter.

Do the X-E5 and X-H2 record 4K video?

X-E5: 4K up to 60p. X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-E5 and X-H2 weather sealed?

X-E5: No. X-H2: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the X-E5 and 540 shots for the X-H2, giving the X-H2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-E5 launched at $1,699 and X-H2 at $1,999. The X-E5 is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X-E5 vs X-H2 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm press materials.