Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-H1

Rugged APS-C flagship that introduced IBIS to Fujifilm X with a pro video-focused body.

$1,899

Released Feb 2018

vs
Alpha 7 IV

Sony

Alpha 7 IV

33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.

$2,499

Released Oct 2021

Alpha 7 IV is 3.7 years newer.

Wins

3categories

X-H1

PortraitTravel

Wins

12categories

Alpha 7 IV

PortraitWildlife

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H1 wins 0 categories·Alpha 7 IV wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 27 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H1Alpha 7 IV
Resolution24.3 MP33 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max12,80051,200
Burst14 fps10 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBIS5.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight673 g658 g
Battery310 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H1

140 × 97 × 86 mm

673 g (1.48 lb / 23.74 oz)

Alpha 7 IV front view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 × 80 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

X-H1 is 9mm wider, 1mm taller, and 6mm thicker than Alpha 7 IV.

X-H1 is 15 g heavier than Alpha 7 IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 86mm X-H1 · 80mm Alpha 7 IV

Sensor size, to scale

X-H1

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

Alpha 7 IV

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H1

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7 IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H1Alpha 7 IV
Portrait
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
3.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H1

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.8, 97.3, 85.5

  • Burst (electronic)

    14 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 IV

  • AF low-light limit

    -4 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8

  • RAW buffer depth

    828 frames vs 27 frames — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Insect…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 7 IV supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • IBIS effectivenessBoth 5.5 stops
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H1

Pros

  • 5-axis IBIS
  • Rugged weather-sealed build
  • 4K video
  • Large grip

Cons

  • Older AF
  • Heavy for APS-C
  • Superseded

Alpha 7 IV

Pros

  • 33MP — more detail for cropping and print
  • 10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
  • Full-size HDMI port
  • 759 phase-detect AF points

Cons

  • 4K 60p requires Super35 crop
  • 10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
  • Complex menu system

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H1
Alpha 7 IV
Resolution
24.3 MP
33 MP+36%
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS III
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
23.6 x 15.6 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
X-H1
Alpha 7 IV
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
425
759+79%
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-1 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
X-H1
Alpha 7 IV
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
10 fps+25%
Burst (electronic)
14 fps+40%
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
27 frames
828 frames30.7× more
X-H1
Alpha 7 IV
Max resolution
4K
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
30 fps
60 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
600 Mbps3× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
None
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
X-H1
Alpha 7 IV
Weight
673 g
658 g−15 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
139.8 × 97.3 × 85.5 mm
131.3 × 96.4 × 79.8 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-H1 or Alpha 7 IV?

Alpha 7 IV scores 8.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for X-H1 — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H1 and Alpha 7 IV?

X-H1 is 24.3 MP and Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H1 and Alpha 7 IV have in-body image stabilization?

X-H1 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H1 or the Alpha 7 IV?

X-H1 reaches 14 fps electronic. Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H1 and Alpha 7 IV?

X-H1 weighs 673 g and Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g, so the Alpha 7 IV is 15 g lighter.

Do the X-H1 and Alpha 7 IV record 4K video?

X-H1: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-H1 and Alpha 7 IV weather sealed?

X-H1: Yes. Alpha 7 IV: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the X-H1 and 580 shots for the Alpha 7 IV, giving the Alpha 7 IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H1 launched at $1,899 and Alpha 7 IV at $2,499. The X-H1 is $600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Sony press materials.