Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-H1
Rugged APS-C flagship that introduced IBIS to Fujifilm X with a pro video-focused body.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Feb 2018
EOS R6 Mark II is 4.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-H1
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 27 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 14 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 310 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-H1
140 × 97 × 86 mm
673 g (1.48 lb / 23.74 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 1mm narrower than X-H1 but it is also 1mm taller and 3mm thicker.
EOS R6 Mark II is 3 g lighter than X-H1.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 86mm X-H1
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H1
140 × 97 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H1
140 × 86 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-H1
23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
368 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-H1
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 27 frames — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 14 fps — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 425 — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 310 shots — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-H1
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 139.8, 97.3, 85.5
Resolution
24.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
- ✓EVF resolution — Both 3,690,000
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-H1
Pros
- ✓5-axis IBIS
- ✓Rugged weather-sealed build
- ✓4K video
- ✓Large grip
Cons
- –Older AF
- –Heavy for APS-C
- –Superseded
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H1 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-H1
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X-H1?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for X-H1 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H1?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-H1 is 24.3 MP, so the X-H1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H1 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-H1 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-H1?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-H1 reaches 14 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H1?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X-H1 weighs 673 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 3 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H1 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-H1: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-H1 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-H1: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 310 shots for the X-H1, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-H1 at $1,899. The X-H1 is $600 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X-H1 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.